• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / News Global

Donetsk and Luhansk: Pseudo-States Denying Religious Liberty

02/23/2022Massimo Introvigne |

The state protection of the Russian Orthodox Church monopoly and the repression of the minorities are among the most brutal in the world.

by Massimo Introvigne

Police officers of the Donetsk People’s Republic.
“Police officers” of the ““Donetsk People’s Republic.” Credits.

The main problem of the “Donetsk People’s Republic” (“DPR”) and “Luhansk People’s Republic” (“LPR”) is that they do not exist. They are regions of Ukraine whose organization as self-proclaimed breakaway states is recognized only by Russia and its minions for their own purposes. These pseudo-states are also notable for their brutal denial of religious liberty, which sometimes makes explicit and enshrines in the “laws” and even in the “constitutions” what is implicit in Russia.

The 2014 “constitution” of the “DPR” – we refer here to the original 2014 version; it has been amended in subsequent published versions, probably also for propaganda purposes – in the world that makes fighting “cults” a constitutional principle. Article 21 of the 2014 “constitution” called for “the implementation of policies to protect the public from the activities of religious cults” (I explained at length in Bitter Winter why “секта” in Russian and similar words in other languages should be translated as “cult” and not as “sect.”)

This was based on an equally “constitutional” protection of the religious monopoly of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) in Donetsk. The “constitution” was drafted “professing the Orthodox faith (the Faith of the Christian Orthodox Catholic Eastern Confession) of the Russian Orthodox Church (Moscow Patriarchate) and recognizing it as the foundation of the foundations of the Russian World” (preamble). The role of the ROC as the “dominant” religion was explicitly guaranteed by Article 9, which adds that this acknowledgment is a “system-forming pillar of the Russian World.”

The consequences were spelled out in Article 22 of the “DPR constitution,” according to which “Propaganda of religious excellence is prohibited.” What this means is clear from the experience of Russia, where laws on extremism allows for the liquidation as “extremist” of religious groups teaching their “excellence” or “superiority,” i.e., that they offer a superior way of salvation with respect to other religions.

Of course, all religions teach this, including the ROC, which nobody bothers. I am a scholar of religion, and have never met a religionist greeting me with “Good morning, I am here to introduce my religion and tell you that it is not better than any other faith.” Clearly, what is forbidden, in the “DPR” as in Russia, is to proclaim that any religion is better than the ROC.

The Orthodox Cathedral of the Transfiguration of Jesus in the city of Donetsk.
The Orthodox Cathedral of the Transfiguration of Jesus in the city of Donetsk. Credits.

The same provision of Article 22 of the 2014 “constitution” of the “DPR” appears in an article with the same number, 22, of the “constitution” of the “Luhansk People’s Republic”: “Propaganda of religious superiority is prohibited.”

These are not mere words. As it happens in Russia, the “DPR” and the “LPR” have both banned the Jehovah’s Witnesses as “extremist.” At least 14 Kingdom’s Halls of the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been confiscated. More generally, both the “DPR” and the “LPR” enacted “laws” according to which religious groups registered in Ukraine need to re-register in the territories they control. If they don’t apply for re-registration, or the same is not granted, their activities become immediately illegal.

At the end of 2019, 195 religious organizations had been re-registered in the “LPR.” 188 belonged to the ROC, four were Muslim, and there was one each of Old Believers, Jews, and Roman Catholics. In addition to the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Baptist, Pentecostal, and Seventh-day Adventist congregations, and several Muslim communities, were consistently denied registration, as were Orthodox groups not in communion with the Moscow Patriarchate. In the “DPR,” almost all non-ROC communities were denied registration.

Non-registered communities were targeted by raids, violence, and arrests; churches and mosques have been closed or transformed into “government” offices or military facilities. All but one mosques were closed in the “DPR.” The Baptist were particularly targeted as “American agents,” although they have a century-old tradition in the region.

What is happening in the pseudo-“Donetsk People’s Republic” and “Luhansk People’s Republic” is a perfect representation of the dystopic Orthodox theocracy Putin’s ideologists have in mind for a “Russian World” whose borders they continuously expand.

Tagged With: Orthodox Churches, Religious Liberty, Ukraine

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Russia, Pastor Moskvitin’s Church Headed for Liquidation

    Russia, Pastor Moskvitin’s Church Headed for Liquidation

  • Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army

    Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army

  • Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot

    Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot

  • Crimes Sending You to Jail in Xinjiang: “We Don’t Trust You,” “You Didn’t Play Piano at Your Wedding”

    Crimes Sending You to Jail in Xinjiang: “We Don’t Trust You,” “You Didn’t Play Piano at Your Wedding”

Keep Reading

  • Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin
    Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin

    How Article 19 and Article 18 (UDHR) are connected, and why journalists and faith communities need each other

  • Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia
    Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia

    By destroying the leading organization monitoring religious liberty violations, the Putin regime can no longer pretend that relics of freedom of religion remain in Russia. 

  • After the China Fiasco: Macron’s Strange Relationship with Human Rights and Religious Liberty
    After the China Fiasco: Macron’s Strange Relationship with Human Rights and Religious Liberty

    It is not the first time the French President shows a dangerous tolerance of dictators and a bizarre disregard for freedom of religion or belief.

  • Scandal: FECRIS Falsifies the Program of a 2017 Conference to Hide that a Fanatical Anti-Ukrainian Russian Lawyer Was Among the Speakers
    Scandal: FECRIS Falsifies the Program of a 2017 Conference to Hide that a Fanatical Anti-Ukrainian Russian Lawyer Was Among the Speakers

    Alexander Korelov claims “former Ukraine” is still “part of my country, the USSR.” FECRIS retroactively changes the program of a 2017 conference to eliminate his name and speech.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • There Are Christian Uyghurs, Too: New Organization Launched in London by Ruth Ingram
  • Hui Muslims Clash with Police Over Mosque’s “Sinicization” by Ma Guangyao
  • Russia: Lunatic Theory that Yellowstone Volcano Caused the War in Ukraine Gains Momentum by Massimo Introvigne
  • Xi Jinping: Beijing’ National Art Museum Is Not Socialist Enough by Hu Zimo
  • Hong-Kong-Style National Security Law Comes to Macau by Gladys Kwok
  • Vandalism Against Catholic Churches on the Rise in Bavaria by PierLuigi Zoccatelli
  • Pakistan: Bishops’ Patience Exhausted After Killings at Catholic School by Daniela Bovolenta

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY