• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / Featured Global

The Anti-Cult Movement. 5. Anti-Cultism Beyond the West

02/09/2022Massimo Introvigne |

In Japan and South Korea, deprogramming continued for decades. In Russia and China, anti-cultism was sponsored and organized by the state.

by Massimo Introvigne

Article 5 of 7. Read article 1, article 2, article 3, and article 4.

Alexander Dvorkin. From Facebook.
Alexander Dvorkin. From Facebook.

While in the West anti-cultists had to confront criticism by mainline scholars, and sometimes opened a dialogue with them, their counterparts in South Korea and Japan stuck to a crude “brainwashing” theory and to deprogramming, which in these countries was mostly practiced by conservative Protestant ministers. They combined a counter-cult theological criticism of heresies with anti-cult theories of “brainwashing.” In Japan, deprogramming was not stopped by courts of law until the seminal decision of the Tokyo High Court in the case of Unification Church member Goto Toru in 2014, who was detained against his will for more than 12 years. The advocacy in favor of Goto by the Brussels-based NGO Human Rights Without Frontiers had an impact on the decision, which was confirmed by the Supreme Court in 2015.

In South Korea, deprogramming continues to this day, despite massive street demonstrations in 2018 after a female member of the new religious movement Shincheonji, Gu Ji-In (1992–2018), was strangled to death by her father while she was trying to escape deprogrammers. South Korean Christian deprogrammers even produce propaganda videos, proposing a unique mix of secular “brainwashing” theories and sectarian criticism of “unbiblical heresies,” targeting both newly formed groups and older organizations they regard as unorthodox, including the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

South Korea: Protests after the assassination of Gu Ji-In. From Facebook.
South Korea: Protests after the assassination of Gu Ji-In. From Facebook.

In post-Soviet Russia, anticult activities were initially promoted by the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) and based on theological criticism against unwelcome competitors in a religious market that was just opening after decades of state-enforced atheism. The ROC’s criticism of the heretics, however, was largely perceived as old-fashioned and unpersuasive. It failed to effectively contain the growth of new religions coming from both Asia and the United States.

In 1992, Alexander Dvorkin, a Russian who had become an American citizen, returned to Moscow from the United States, where he had spent fifteen years, converted to Orthodox Christianity, and obtained college degrees in Theology and Medieval Studies. In the United States, Dvorkin had been exposed to the theories of the anti-cult movement. Upon his return to Russia, he sought employment with the ROC, which quickly came to see in him a man of providence, sent to modernize the dusty anticultism of the Church and make it palatable to the secular authorities.

Just one year after he had arrived in Russia, Dvorkin became the head of the newly established countercult branch of the ROC, the Saint Irenaeus of Lyon Information and Consultation Center, and a professor of Cultic Studies at the ROC University of Saint Tikhon. He started advocating for the official repression of religious organizations he accused of “stealing sheep” from the ROC, targeting in particular the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

While firmly grounded in Russian Orthodox theology, Dvorkin’s theories about the danger of the cults aimed at persuading the officially secular (but deeply indebted to the ROC for electoral and political support) Russian politicians that action should be taken against the “cults.” After 9/11, and several terrorist attacks by Islamic fundamentalists on Russian soil, the Russian Parliament passed increasingly severe laws on “extremism.” Dvorkin managed to persuade the authorities that “religious extremism” was at work even when there was no violence nor incitement to violence, and that peaceful groups such as Jehovah’s Witnesses were in fact “extremists” because they advocated for the superiority of their organization over the ROC and tried to convert ROC members.

Russia: right-wing extremists demonstrate against the Jehovah’s Witnesses. From Facebook
Russia: right-wing extremists demonstrate against the Jehovah’s Witnesses. From Facebook.

In 2009, Dvorkin was appointed head of the government’s Council of Religious Experts, with a crucial role in designating which groups should be regarded as extremist and banned. Although he occasionally embarrassed both the government and the ROC for his violent language and attacks against mainline religions such as Hinduism and Islam, which caused international problems for Russia, in 2017 Dvorkin managed to have the Jehovah’s Witnesses banned in his country as “extremist.” He also lectured in other countries, advocating similar measures.

While the main financial support of European anti-cultism had traditionally come from the French government, Russia started to court anti-cult organizations in various countries, and promoted Dvorkin as an international expert on “cults” and “extremism.” In 2009, Dvorkin was elected vice-president of the European Federation of Research and Information Centers on Sectarianism (FECRIS), a position he maintained until 2021. Apparently, none of the more secular European anti-cult leaders—some of them self-styled atheists—objected to having a ROC employee in this position.

In 2020, the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), a bipartisan commission of the U.S. federal government, identified both Dvorkin and FECRIS among the main threats to the global cause of religious liberty, denouncing them for their promotion of “pseudo-scientific concepts” about “cults.” USCIRF particularly singled out Dvorkin’s and FECRIS’ role in the persecution of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Dvorkin and other European anti-cultists, including American deprogrammer Rick Ross, also visited China. There, in 1999, a new nationwide campaign had been launched to eradicate “cults” after the start of the conflict between the authorities and Falun Gong, a new religious movements based on the practice of qigong that had grown rapidly in the 1990s. Eventually, China organized the largest and best-funded anticult association in the world. In its repression of religious movements it labeled as xie jiao, it started using the Western rhetoric against “cults.”

China: anti-cult propaganda through comics. From Weibo.
China: anti-cult propaganda through comics. From Weibo.

In fact, xie jiao is a notion dating back to Fu Yi (555–639), a court scholar of the Tang dynasty who created the expression, literally meaning “heterodox teachings,” to designate Buddhism and call for its eradication. The notion of xie jiao as groups both theologically heterodox and politically subversive was used in China for the following 14 centuries, and was institutionalized as a legal concept in the late Ming period, in the 17th century. It was inherited by both Republican and Communist China, where currently the law makes being active in a xie jiao a crime, punished by Article 300 of the Chinese Criminal Code.

Official contemporary Chinese documents in English translate xie jiao as “cults” or “evil cults.” This is both linguistically questionable and anachronistic, considering the early historical origins of the term. Chinese Marxist scholar Zhang Xinzhang has recently suggested that xie jiao should not be translated at all into English, and left as it is as English texts normally do for qigong or kung fu. However, the Chinese government started translating xie jiao as “cults” after Chinese and Western (and Russian) anti-cultists started interacting with each other.

The translation also has political meaning and consequences. On the one hand, it enrolls Western anti-cultists among the supporters of the Chinese repression of the xie jiao. On the other hand, claiming that “cults” and xie jiao are one and the same allows the Chinese authorities to apply analogically the anti-xie-jiao article 300 to religious organizations that are not included in the official list of the xie jiao, which is periodically updated, but are indicated as “cults” by Western anti-cultists.

One example is the decision of the People’s Court of Korla City, Xinjiang, of June 30, 2020, which imposed heavy jail sentences against 18 Jehovah’s Witnesses. The Jehovah’s Witnesses are not included in the official list of the xie jiao. Yet, the legal statute against the xie jiao, article 300, was enforced against the defendants.

Tagged With: Anti-Cult

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Russia Claims It Is Under Attack from Pro-Ukrainian Psychics, “Nazi-Cannibals,” and “Evil Spirits”

    Russia Claims It Is Under Attack from Pro-Ukrainian Psychics, “Nazi-Cannibals,” and “Evil Spirits”

  • Un hiver amer (Bitter Winter) pour la MIVILUDES

    Un hiver amer (Bitter Winter) pour la MIVILUDES

  • Novopashin confirme : « Les anti-sectes russes font toujours partie de la FECRIS »

    Novopashin confirme : « Les anti-sectes russes font toujours partie de la FECRIS »

  • “Église de Philadelphie”: How MIVILUDES and French Anti-Cultists Invented a “Cult”

    “Église de Philadelphie”: How MIVILUDES and French Anti-Cultists Invented a “Cult”

Keep Reading

  • Anti-Cultists Blame “Ukraine-Funded Theosophical Cult” for Russian Protests Against the War
    Anti-Cultists Blame “Ukraine-Funded Theosophical Cult” for Russian Protests Against the War

    They claim that Svetlana Peunova’s Academy of Development and Way to the Sun organized the opposition to mobilization on behalf of Ukraine.

  • 82 Ukrainian Academics Ask France to Stop Supporting the Anti-Cult Federation FECRIS
    82 Ukrainian Academics Ask France to Stop Supporting the Anti-Cult Federation FECRIS

    Virtually all Ukrainian scholars of religion wrote to President Macron denouncing the complicity between Western anti-cultists and their Russian homologues who keep slandering Ukraine

  • Former Anti-Cult Boss Peng Bo Sentenced to 14 Years in Jail
    Former Anti-Cult Boss Peng Bo Sentenced to 14 Years in Jail

    To escape the death penalty, he admitted that he took bribes and became “superstitious” himself. What he was really been punished for was his lack of effectiveness.

  • Seoul Sungrak Church: One of the World’s Largest Baptist Churches Banned as a “Cult” in China
    Seoul Sungrak Church: One of the World’s Largest Baptist Churches Banned as a “Cult” in China

    China’s desire to please Korean anti-cultists, with whom it regularly cooperates, may have been a factor in the decision.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY