• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Featured Global

The Anti-Cult Movement. 4. Anti-Cultism Goes to Europe

02/08/2022Massimo Introvigne |

The suicides and homicides of the Order of the Solar Temple in the 1990s were used to justify a witch hunt against hundreds of groups. Scholars reacted.

by Massimo Introvigne.

Article 4 of 7. Read article 1, article 2, and article 3.

Old battles: the French report on “cults” (1995) and the book the author co-edited to answer it.
Old battles: the French report on “cults” (1995) and the book the author co-edited to answer it.

In the previous article, we discussed the origins of the secular anti-cult movement in the United States. Shortly after the first anti-cult organizations were established in the U.S., a number of anti-cult movements were created in Western Europe, including in 1976 FAIR (Family, Action, Information, Rescue) in the United Kingdom, and in 1974 ADFI, the Association pour la défense des valeurs familiales et de l’individu (Association for the defense of family values and individuals), later Association de défense des familles et de l’individu (Association for the defense of families and individuals), in France, where several local ADFIs federated in a national UNADFI in 1982.

In Europe in general, anticultism was revitalized after the suicides and homicides perpetrated by the Order of the Solar Temple, a new religious movement based on a mixture of esoteric ideas and apocalyptic expectations, in Switzerland, France, and Canada, in 1994, 1995, and 1997. Although several of those who died in the Solar Temple tragedy were wealthy professionals, which contrasted with the popular image of “cults” finding their followers mostly among marginal or poor segments of the population, large media anti-cult campaigns followed.

In the wake of the Solar Temple incidents, in many Western European countries (with the significant exception of the United Kingdom) parliamentary or administrative committees were appointed that produced reports about “cults” or about specific groups. In some countries, the reports called for the appointment of specific anti-cult agencies, new bills, or amendments to existing laws.

In a study I co-authored with James T. Richardson, we reviewed the reports published in Europe between 1996 and 2000, distinguishing between what we called Type I and Type II documents. Type I documents were all published in the French language, in France, Belgium, and the French-speaking part of Switzerland, adopted the classic anti-cult model, and called for new legislation. Type II reports, including a Dutch report and a long document approved by the German Parliament, considered the scholarly criticism of the anticult “brainwashing” model, and were more nuanced in their conclusions.

James T. Richardson (left) and Massimo Introvigne
James T. Richardson (left) and Massimo Introvigne.

In the end, Belgium did not legislate on “brainwashing” but in 1998 created an administrative task force and an information center to combat cults, CIAOSN (Centre d’information et d’avis sur les organisations sectaires nuisibles, Centre for information and advice on harmful cultic organizations). France established first the Observatoire interministériel sur les sectes (Inter-ministerial Observatory of Cult, 1996–98), then the MILS (Mission interministérielle de lutte contre les sectes, Inter-ministerial mission for combating cults, 1998–2002), and finally in 2002 the MIVILUDES (Mission interministérielle de vigilance et de lutte contre les dérives sectaires, the Inter-ministerial mission for monitoring and combating cultic deviances). Because of the peculiar tradition of hostility to religion in France, these agencies emerged among the main purveyors of the anti-cult ideology internationally.

They were also influenced by both Catholic counter-cultists and secular anti-cultists and, from the beginning, targeted large religious organizations considered unorthodox by the Catholics such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses together with newly established religious movements. The attempt to apply to organizations such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses an anti-cult model that had been created for groups including mostly young and full-time members exposed the MIVILUDES documents to sustained criticism by academic scholars.

In 2001, France also introduced a new provision in the Criminal Code (article 223-15-2) aimed at repressing “cultic brainwashing,” punishing with a jail penalty of up to three years for those who use techniques creating a state of “physical or psychological subjection.” Anti-cultists also persuaded the government to use tax tools and issue heavy tax bills against “cults,” including the Jehovah’s Witnesses, although these measures were later cancelled by the European Court of Human Rights, which consistently ruled against France, including in a landmark case that the Jehovah’s Witnesses won in 2011.

The fact that in Europe, unlike in the United States, the anti-cult movement heavily influenced the legislation and actions of some governments persuaded many scholars that they cannot remain “neutral,” and should expose the pseudo-scientific theories of the anti-cultists. While the anti-cult movement developed, academic scholars created the new discipline of new religious movements (NRM) studies. Most of them concluded, based on their own observation of the movements, which they refused to call “cults,” believing that the term was loaded with a negative value judgement, that anti-cultism was based on faulty pseudo-scientific theories such as “brainwashing,” and that there were no reasons to maintain a distinction between deviant “cults” and “genuine” or “legitimate” forms of religion. Crimes had been committed by leaders and members of some NRMs, but there had been criminals among mainline religionists too.

European anti-cultists also relied on a handful of North American scholars, who lectured in support of campaigns against Scientology and other new religious movements, including Janja Lalich, who based her writings on what she described as her personal experience in a “political cult,” the Marxist-Leninist Democratic Workers Party, and Alexandra Stein, a social psychologist based in England. Just like Lalich, Stein has also been associated with what she called a “political cult,” the Minneapolis Maoist group known as The O. Self-styled cult experts who had been active in deprogramming, such as Steven Hassan and Rick Ross, also lectured internationally on behalf of the anti-cult ideology.

W. Michael Ashcraft noted in his seminal history of the academic study of new religious movements, that a handful of scholars seceded from the majority of their colleagues to create a new discipline they called “cultic studies.” This branch accepts the distinction between religions and “cults,” and identifies “cults” by their harmfulness to their members and society and the use of mind control techniques. As Ashcraft observed, cultic studies were never accepted as mainstream scholarship. They continued as “a project shared by a small cadre of committed scholars” but not endorsed by “the larger academic community, nationally and internationally” (A Historical Introduction to the Study of New Religious Movements, London and New York: Routledge 2018, 9). Lalich and (later) Stein were part of this project, but it was Canadian sociologist Stephen A. Kent who emerged as the most well-known exponent of “cultic studies” and a popular lecturer in the international anti-cult circuit.

Benjamin Zablocki. From Facebook.
Benjamin Zablocki. From Facebook.

A scholar who proposed a somewhat more moderate anti-cult model was American sociologist Benjamin Zablocki (1941–2020). He was also one of the participants from the “cultic studies” side in a dialogue with scholars of new religious movements aimed, if not at resolving the differences, at least at avoiding the name-calling and lawsuits typical of the years of the so-called “cult wars,” which took place in the last decades of the 20th century. Thanks to the efforts of Eileen Barker, Michael Langone, and others, in the twenty-first century this dialogue has increasingly developed between some of the “cultic studies” activists and mainline scholars of new religious movements, although in Europe it has remained somewhat more difficult than in the United States.

Tagged With: Anti-Cult

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Did French Diplomacy Support an Anti-Cult Extremist Who Calls Buddhists and LDS “Cultists”?

    Did French Diplomacy Support an Anti-Cult Extremist Who Calls Buddhists and LDS “Cultists”?

  • Argentina: How the Jesus Christians Defeated Pablo Salum and PROTEX

    Argentina: How the Jesus Christians Defeated Pablo Salum and PROTEX

  • France: Raelians Told that a “Cult” Cannot Rent a Room in an Accor Hotel

    France: Raelians Told that a “Cult” Cannot Rent a Room in an Accor Hotel

  • MIVILUDES, de la tragédie à la farce : un huissier contraint Georges Fenech à payer ses dettes à la Scientology

    MIVILUDES, de la tragédie à la farce : un huissier contraint Georges Fenech à payer ses dettes à la Scientology

Keep Reading

  • Occupied Ukraine: Anti-Cult “Experts” Target Moscow Patriarchate Dissident Priest
    Occupied Ukraine: Anti-Cult “Experts” Target Moscow Patriarchate Dissident Priest

    A “psycholinguistic expert analysis” concluded that Luhansk’ Father Feognost is “working for the enemy.”

  • Russia: Anapa Pastor Sent to Labor Colony for Contacts with “Undesirable” Foreign Churches
    Russia: Anapa Pastor Sent to Labor Colony for Contacts with “Undesirable” Foreign Churches

    Pastor Nikolai Bogoslavsky of Christ the Savior Church was convicted for keeping in touch with the Latvian-based New Generation movement.

  • MIVILUDES, from Tragedy to Farce: Bailiff Compels Georges Fenech to Pay His Debts to Scientology
    MIVILUDES, from Tragedy to Farce: Bailiff Compels Georges Fenech to Pay His Debts to Scientology

    Former MIVILUDES chief and member of its Orientation Council had € 5,000 plus interests seized from his bank account.

  • Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan
    Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan

    While certain features of criticism against “cults” are international, others are typical of the Sinosphere and are present in both cases.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Chinese Muslims Told Mosques Should Preach Communism Too by Ma Wenyan
  • China’s “Query System for Islamic, Catholic, and Christian Clergy,” Another Tool for Repression by He Yuyan
  • Hebei: Friends Pray in Your Home, the CCP Cuts Off Your Water and Electricity by Lai Mingxia
  • Christian Students Asked to Study 20th Congress and Celebrate “Heroes” Who Betrayed the Church by Zhang Chunhua
  • Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army by Massimo Introvigne
  • Filipino Catholic Priest Arrested for Slandering Unrecognized Marian Apparitions by Massimo Introvigne
  • Pakistan, Young Christian Sentenced to Death for Blasphemy by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY