A coordinated statement from multiple UN mandate‑holders intensifies scrutiny of Pakistan’s treatment of the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.
by A. Sahara Alexander
Last week, a group of UN experts issued a detailed warning about the situation of Ahmadis in Pakistan. The statement was released jointly by Morris Tidball‑Binz, Special Rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions; Nazila Ghanea, Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief; Nicolas Levrat, Special Rapporteur on minority issues; Leopoldo Maldonado Gutiérrez, Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression; Gina Romero, Special Rapporteur on the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and of association; and the experts of the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention. Their intervention adds weight to concerns that have accumulated over years of reports documenting violence, harassment, and legal restrictions imposed on Ahmadis across the country.
The experts stated that they were “deeply concerned by persistent reports that members of the Ahmadiyya community continue to face harassment, criminal prosecution, violence, and exclusion because of their religious identity.” They emphasized that “every individual has the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion or belief,” and insisted that no person should be subjected to discrimination, intimidation, or violence for peacefully manifesting their faith.
Their warning follows a pattern of incidents that have been reported with regularity. Attacks on Ahmadi places of worship continue to occur, and graves have been desecrated in several districts. Families have described interference with religious observance during Eid‑ul‑Fitr and Eid‑ul‑Adha, including surveillance and threats. Reports from the ground indicate that families have been targeted inside their homes, and that local authorities have failed to intervene in situations where intimidation escalated into violence.
Arrests and prosecutions related to religious practices or identity have been documented by civil society groups, and hate speech circulates widely both offline and online. The experts noted that these developments “underscore the need for effective measures to prevent violence, ensure accountability, and protect vulnerable communities.”
They reminded Pakistan of its obligations under international human rights law. According to the statement, “the State has a responsibility to exercise due diligence to prevent human rights violations, investigate allegations promptly and impartially, prosecute those responsible in accordance with international standards, and provide effective remedies to victims.” They added that “Pakistan must break the pattern of impunity that has allowed perpetrators of attacks and incitement to hatred and violence to act without restraint,” and warned that these attacks occur “with tacit official complicity whilst the cycle of fear prevents people and institutions from upholding the rights and dignity of these minority groups.”
The statement calls on Pakistan to ensure equal protection under the law for all individuals regardless of religion or belief. It urges a review of anti-Ahmadi legislation and administrative measures that may conflict with international obligations, including those related to freedom of religion or belief, freedom of expression, freedom of association and assembly, cultural rights, and equality before the law.
The experts also noted that “combating religious intolerance requires more than responding to individual incidents,” and that sustained efforts are needed to foster respect for diversity, counter incitement to hatred and violence, and create an environment in which all religious or belief communities can live in safety and dignity.
Their intervention adds pressure at a moment when concerns about the security of Ahmadis have intensified. The pattern described in the statement aligns with reports from human rights organizations and testimonies collected over recent years. The involvement of multiple Special Rapporteurs and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention signals that the situation is viewed as affecting several core human rights simultaneously, including life, liberty, religious freedom, and minority protection.
Uses a pseudonym for security reasons.
