• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / China / Featured China

The “Origins of Chinese Civilization” Project: Xi Jinping Explains Why It Matters

08/18/2022Massimo Introvigne |

Sixteen years of efforts by the CCP were aimed at building a “Marxist” theory of China’s history—proving inter alia that the Uyghurs are in fact Chinese.

by Massimo Introvigne

Xi Jinping opening on September 24, 2014, the symposium commemorating in Beijing the 2565th birthday of Confucius. From Weibo.
Xi Jinping opening on September 24, 2014, the symposium commemorating in Beijing the 2565th birthday of Confucius. From Weibo.

There are projects on which the CCP invests enormous resources that get little or no coverage in Western media. Yet, they are important to understand how the CCP operates. One spectacular case is the “National Research Project on Tracing the Origins of Chinese Civilization” (中华文明探源工程), which lasted from sixteen years from 2002 to 2018 and mobilized more than 400 scholars and CCP ideologists, and 70 universities. It originated with Hu Jintao, but was concluded by Xi Jinping.

On July 15, the theoretical journal of the CCP, “Seeking Truth” (Qiushi) published a long article by Xi Jinping, derived from his speech of May 27, 2002, at the 39th collective study session of the Political Bureau of the CCP’s Central Committee devoted to examining the results of the “Origins of Chinese Civilization Project.” Here, Western readers need to pause and consider what exactly happened. The Politburo, i.e., the highest body of the CCP, in the middle of several national and international crises, devoted his time to study the origins of Chinese civilization, and Xi Jinping himself gave the main speech.

There are long-term and short-term reasons for this, and both should be understood. The 1993 essay and 1996 book by Samuel Huntington on the clash of civilizations are somewhat out of fashion in the West but continue to be studied in China. Xi Jinping himself refers to them in the article, stating that the CCP should reject the part about the “clash” but be inspired (which does not mean following it blindly) by the notion of “civilization.”

It is a CCP mantra that China is the civilization par excellence, the only one that has an uninterrupted 5,000-year history. More precisely, Xi reminds us that the “Origins” project has affirmed that China has “a million-year human history, 10,000 years of cultural history, and more than 5,000 years of civilizational history.”

Being proud of a nation’s past happens in all countries, and certainly China has a lot to be proud of in terms of art, culture, and science. However, Xi Jinping’s presentation of the “Origins” project is not limited to this legitimate pride. There is the disturbing idea that “those who control history control the country,” that history in itself political, and that it should be ultimately controlled by the CCP, not by professional historians.

Those who do not adhere to the guidance of the CCP are “historical nihilists” or “cultural nihilists.” These are not merely controversial positions in Xi Jinping’s China. They are crimes, and those accused of “historical nihilism” lose their academic positions and earn a good chance of going to jail.

Another point is that history, Xi Jinping insists, should be interpreted through the lenses of Marxist ideology. While some Western theories submit ideologies to the test of history, the CCP fully intends to submit history to the test of ideology. “Our Party, Xi explains, has always viewed the history of the Chinese nation with the standpoint and method of historical materialism… We are Marxist historicists.” In interpreting, teaching, and present history, Xi insists, “we must adhere to the fundamental guiding ideology of Marxism.”

In the article, Xi himself provides a clear example of ideological interpretation of Chinese history. He has personally participated in ceremonies honoring Confucius, but states, attributing the idea to Chairman Mao, that “Confucius became a sage because he was a revolutionary and participated in rebellions everywhere.” There is much we do not know about Confucius, but from what we know he was rather a traditionalist who wanted to restore a lost social order and praised social stability.

Twisting history, making even Confucius into a proto-Marxist revolutionary, also serves more immediate aims. Xi insists that Chinese civilization is inherently peaceful, based on “dialogue and tolerance,” and “has been famous for its openness and inclusiveness since ancient times.” In fact, like all great empires, China has had its imperialistic times and has expanded by conquering and destroying neighboring states. However, the argument that China is historically peaceful and surrounded by imperialistic neighbors has been used by Chinese propaganda and “wolf warrior diplomacy” in recent territorial disputes with India and Japan.

Xi is even more interested in building a narrative “proving” that all the populations included within the present borders of the People’s Republic are part of the Chinese civilization and included in the famous 5,000-year uninterrupted Chinese history. One of the aims of the “Origins” project was to counter Western interpretations of archeological findings that point to the presence of non-Chinese civilizations in present-day China.

Chinese archeologists who discovered the so-called Sanxingdui civilization in Sichuan, dating back to some 1,100 years before Christ, were highly praised, but the “Origins” project devoted considerable resources to counter Western theories that the Sanxingdui culture was so distinctive that it cannot be included in a Chinese continuity. In fact, in the same issue of the Qiushi Xi Jinping’s article was followed by one by the staff of the Sanxingdui Museum arguing that the Sanxingdui culture was Chinese, and if anything proved the “pluralistic unity” of the Chinese civilization.

Chinese civilization: bronze animal mask from the Sanxingdui culture. Note the distinctive, hardly “Chinese” features. Credits.
Bronze animal mask from the Sanxingdui culture. Note the distinctive, hardly “Chinese” features. Credits.

Xi Jinping made abundantly clear why controlling history and making the “pluralistic unity” of the Chinese civilization co-extensive to the present borders of China is essential when earlier this month he visited Xinjiang. He made a stop at the Museum of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, and stated in so many words that the Uyghurs are Chinese, too. “Chinese civilization is extensive and profound, has a long history stretching back to antiquity, and is composed of outstanding cultures of all its ethnic groups,” Xi said. He called for “further study on the history of the community for the Chinese nation.”

He added that “we should make full and effective use of the historical facts, archaeological objects, and cultural heritage on the exchanges between various ethnic groups in Xinjiang, to prove that this region inhabited by many ethnic groups has been an integral part of China since the ancient times, and that various ethnic groups in Xinjiang have been important members of the big Chinese family in weal and woe.”

Arguing for the “Chinese” nature of Xinjiang cultures at the Museum of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Credits.
Arguing for the “Chinese” nature of Xinjiang cultures at the Museum of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. Credits.

The Uyghurs do not believe that they are “members of the big Chinese family.” However, history will be twisted as much as needed to argue that they live in “an integral part of China since the ancient times.” Tibetans may expect just the same.

Tagged With: Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Pastor Hao Zhiwei: 8-Year Prison Sentence Confirmed on Appeal

    Pastor Hao Zhiwei: 8-Year Prison Sentence Confirmed on Appeal

  • Dissident Who Revealed Abuses in Psychiatric Hospitals Is Sent There Again

    Dissident Who Revealed Abuses in Psychiatric Hospitals Is Sent There Again

  • Xi Jinping’s Third Term: A Uyghur View

    Xi Jinping’s Third Term: A Uyghur View

  • Former Anti-Cult Boss Peng Bo Sentenced to 14 Years in Jail

    Former Anti-Cult Boss Peng Bo Sentenced to 14 Years in Jail

Keep Reading

  • Tibet: Who Killed the Friend of Black-Necked Cranes?
    Tibet: Who Killed the Friend of Black-Necked Cranes?

    Luo Huaibin, a famous scholar who protested the destruction of Tibetan forests and wetlands, was assassinated in 2020. The assassins are still at large.

  • “Xi Jinping 2.0”: A Cold, Brutal, Inexorable Power Machine
    “Xi Jinping 2.0”: A Cold, Brutal, Inexorable Power Machine

    After the 20th National Congress of the Chinese Communist Party, President Xi Jinping enjoys an unchecked, and monstruous, authority on all Chinese.

  • Xi Jinping Takes New Standing Committee to the Site of Mao’s Bloodiest Purge
    Xi Jinping Takes New Standing Committee to the Site of Mao’s Bloodiest Purge

    The first act of the new leadership is a pilgrimage to Yan’an, where Mao “rectified” the Party by executing 10,000 “weak” members.

  • China #1 “Cult-Buster” vs. China’s #1 Doctor: Who Will Win?
    China #1 “Cult-Buster” vs. China’s #1 Doctor: Who Will Win?

    “Hero of atheism” and anti-cultist Sima Nan vilifies Zhang Wenhong, the chief of the anti-COVID Shanghai Medical Treatment Expert Group.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY