• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / Featured Global

The Anti-Cult Movement. 7. The Crisis and Revival of the Anti-Cult Movement

02/11/2022Massimo Introvigne |

In the 1990s, anti-cultists lost crucial court cases in the United States. They survived thanks to the support of some governments and several media.

by Massimo Introvigne

Article 7 of 7. Read article 1, article 2, article 3, article 4, article 5, and article 6.

Deprogrammer Rick Ross. From Facebook.
Deprogrammer Rick Ross. From Facebook.

In the United States, the golden years of the anti-cult movement ended in the early 1990s. In 1990, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in the case United States v. Fishman that the theory of brainwashing as applied to “cults […] did not represent a meaningful scientific concept,” and “theories regarding the coercive persuasion practiced by religious cults are not sufficiently established to be admitted as evidence in federal courts of law.”

After Fishman, it became more difficult for anti-cult activists and “cultic studies” scholars to be accepted in U.S. federal courts as expert witnesses on “cults” and “brainwashing,” which eventually created problems for them in state courts as well. Deprogrammers found still less tolerance, even in local courts. The Fishman ruling did not spell out the definitive end of the use in U.S. courts of anti-cult theories. However, it made life for anti-cultists much more difficult.

In 1995, deprogrammer Rick Ross was involved in a civil trial after he had unsuccessfully tried to deprogram Jason Scott, a member of the United Pentecostal Church, a 5-million strong Christian denomination few would regard as either a “cult” or a new religious movement. Scott was supported by lawyers and detectives from the Church of Scientology, who demonstrated that his mother had been referred to Ross by the Cult Awareness Network (CAN), at that time the largest American anti-cult organization. The latter was sentenced to pay millions of dollars in damages by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in 1998, and went bankrupt. CAN’s name and assets were purchased by a Scientology-related group, which allowed sociologist Anson D. Shupe and his team free access to the CAN archives, where they found evidence of several illegal activities.

The possibility of the American anti-cult movement to influence legislation and determine through its expert witnesses the outcome of court cases involving “cults” was greatly reduced, if not destroyed, by the setbacks it suffered in the Fishman and Scott trials.

However, the anti-cult movement did not disappear. Its defeats in American courts had only a limited influence in other countries. As previously mentioned in this series, both in democratic countries such as France and Belgium (as well as in some states of Germany) and non-democratic countries such as Russia and China, variations of the anti-cult ideology were officially adopted by the governments, and anti-cultism was financially supported by the states, a situation that continues to this day.

Both in the United States and Europe, as well as in Australia and New Zealand, Japan, South Korea, and Latin America, anti-cultists had also cultivated for decades a friendly relations with several media. Anti-cult theories were debunked in the academia, where the few scholars supporting the anti-cult movement were always a marginalized minority. These theories were also resisted in courts of law, particularly in the United States but in other countries as well, where judges played an important role in limiting the effects of official anti-cult hostility. In Europe, when national court cases failed, the European Court of Human Rights repeatedly ruled against anti-cult measures in the name of religious liberty, censoring Russia, France, and other countries for their policies discriminating as “cults” the Jehovah’s Witnesses and other groups.

A typical sensational coverage of “cults” (sectes) in the French media.
A typical sensational coverage of “cults” (sectes) in the French media.

However, there was one arena where the situation was reversed: the news media. While both in the academia and in the courts of democratic countries, the anti-cult faction lost most of its battles, in the media the opposite happened. It is true that quality media were always willing to give voice to scholars of new religious movements and provide some balance. However, in most popular media the anti-cult narrative prevailed.

There are several reasons why this happened. One is a certain anti-religious bias that has been often noted in Western media. Another is a libertarian prejudice, perhaps more prevalent among reporters than within society at large, inducing the former to see with antipathy high-demand organizations where members are supposed to obey the leaders, believe in dogmatic doctrines, and sacrifice a part of their liberty for the sake of a religious cause. I have explained elsewhere how this libertarian prejudice generated, for example, hostility to the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

The main reason, however, is that media are looking for newsworthy items. A “cult” abusing members is news. A religious movement contributing to the public good through its social activities or whose members are law-abiding and happy citizens is not news. Anti-cultists provide just the sensational information about religious organizations reporters may easily turn into headline news. When groups such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses and others are accused of hiding sexual abuse, some media are happy to jump on the anti-cult bandwagon, without examining too carefully whether there are more or less cases of abuse among the Jehovah’s Witnesses than in mainline religions or the society at large. By combining two sensational themes, “cults” and illicit sex, spicy stories are easily produced.

Media’s sympathy for the anti-cult narrative is decade-old and not easy to overcome—except when some media realize that a real original and unconventional story about groups labeled as “cults” is one that calls the prevailing anti-cult template into question. And recently, the “cult” model has gained a new popularity to explain phenomena such as QAnon, conspiracy theories about COVID-19, and right-wing political extremism. It is an easy explanation for the media, and one anti-cultists are willing to support with public statements, that QAnon, the anti-vax movement, and even some forms of right-wing political radicalism are just “cults” with abusive leaders who operate through the psychological manipulation of their followers. To his credit, even a veteran critic of “cults” such as Michael Langone, from the International Cultic Studies Association, has argued that there are serious problems in applying the anti-cult model to QAnon and similar phenomena.

Image 3: A QAnon flag.
A QAnon flag. Credits.

The anti-cult model continues to be successful among journalists, however, because it is simple, easily applicable, and seems to dispense from much more complicated and lengthy investigations into political ideology and religious theology.

It is also a tool that produces unavoidably labeling, discrimination, and injustice. Discrimination of unpopular minorities is, however, as old as humanity. Teaching new generations of citizens—and of reporters—that discrimination is wrong, including discrimination of religious organization their opponents label as “cults,” is a lengthy educational process, but one that is needed to preserve both religious liberty and a civilized interaction between majorities and minorities in our democratic societies.

Tagged With: Anti-Cult

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Rapport 2022 de la MIVILUDES : de la négligence à la diffamation

    Rapport 2022 de la MIVILUDES : de la négligence à la diffamation

  • Russia Claims It Is Under Attack from Pro-Ukrainian Psychics, “Nazi-Cannibals,” and “Evil Spirits”

    Russia Claims It Is Under Attack from Pro-Ukrainian Psychics, “Nazi-Cannibals,” and “Evil Spirits”

  • “Église de Philadelphie”: How MIVILUDES and French Anti-Cultists Invented a “Cult”

    “Église de Philadelphie”: How MIVILUDES and French Anti-Cultists Invented a “Cult”

  • Spanish Supreme Court: Political Parties Cannot Exclude “Cult” Devotees as Candidates

    Spanish Supreme Court: Political Parties Cannot Exclude “Cult” Devotees as Candidates

Keep Reading

  • China #1 “Cult-Buster” vs. China’s #1 Doctor: Who Will Win?
    China #1 “Cult-Buster” vs. China’s #1 Doctor: Who Will Win?

    “Hero of atheism” and anti-cultist Sima Nan vilifies Zhang Wenhong, the chief of the anti-COVID Shanghai Medical Treatment Expert Group.

  • MIVILUDES’ rapport van 2022: van slordig tot lasterlijk
    MIVILUDES’ rapport van 2022: van slordig tot lasterlijk

    Er is niet alleen zoals gebruikelijk een dubieuze methode gebruikt, het rapport bevat ook informatie waarvan MIVILUDES had moeten weten dat die onjuist is.

  • « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».
    « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».

    En 2011, la femme et les quatre enfants d’un aristocrate français ont été assassinés. Les militants antisectes ont tenté de relier ce crime aux « sectes ». Leur action en justice vient de s’effondrer.

  • 82 Ukrainian Academics Ask France to Stop Supporting the Anti-Cult Federation FECRIS
    82 Ukrainian Academics Ask France to Stop Supporting the Anti-Cult Federation FECRIS

    Virtually all Ukrainian scholars of religion wrote to President Macron denouncing the complicity between Western anti-cultists and their Russian homologues who keep slandering Ukraine

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY