• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Featured Global

Victorian “Conversion Practices” Bill: Concerns for Religious Liberty

01/09/2021Massimo Introvigne |

The draft law pursues the laudable aim to prevent violence and the use of quack therapies against homosexuals, but may criminalize legitimate religious counseling.

by Massimo Introvigne

A Gay Pride parade in Melbourne, Victoria.
A Gay Pride parade in Melbourne, Victoria (credits).

Christian and other religious denominations in the Australian state of Victoria are expressing concern that a draft law known as Change or Suppression (Conversion) Practices Prohibition Bill (2020), which has passed the Legislative Assembly and is expected to be approved by the Legislative Council as well, may create problems for freedom of religion. Catholics and Presbyterians are especially critical of the proposed legislation, while Anglicans and Baptists have expressed a more favorable opinion about the aims of the law.

The matter of the draft bill is delicate, and should be understood against a broader background. The “conversion practices” the draft law intends to prohibit are those intended to change a person’s sexual identity, most commonly from LGBTQ to heterosexual. Often, as the law mentions, these practices are carried out for religious motivations, because several religions regard sex outside a man-woman marriage as a sin, and in a religious context.

There is indeed a problem, not only in the state of Victoria, when LGBTQ adults are kidnapped in the streets, often by or on behalf of their parents, detained, and submitted to “counseling,” sometimes accompanied by violence, until their captors are satisfied that their sexual orientation has been “corrected.” It also happens that minors are submitted to similar violent practices. This is similar to “deprogramming,” used by “de-convert” persons who have joined what their parents regard as a “cult.” Indeed, in South Korea, the same fundamentalist Christian groups support “deprogramming” from “cults” and “deprogramming” from homosexuality. Leading religious figures throughout the world have asked that such practices be outlawed.

The Christian and other religious groups who came together to express their concern for the Victorian draft law clarified that they join the legislators in condemning violent practices. They also do not support discrimination of homosexuals, nor folk or quack psychotherapies aimed at changing a person’s sexual orientation that may cause serious harm to those submitted to them.

But there are some aspects of the law they consider problematic. First, they regard prison terms up to ten years imposed on those who engage in “conversion practices” as excessive. Legislators have answered that only draconian penalties would work, but critics maintain that no evidence has been offered that the problem is so widespread and dramatic in Victoria.

Second, the law includes among “conversion practices” “a religious practice including, but not limited to, a prayer based practice” (section 5.3), and clarifies that the consent of the person submitted to the practice does not make it legal.

This is the point that has raised more objections by religious organizations. Victoria’s then Attorney General Jill Hennessy tried to address them on November 26, 2020, during the second reading of the bill in the Legislative Assembly. Hennessy gave as an example of a prohibited practice “A person going to a religious leader seeking advice on their feelings of same-sex attraction, and the religious leader telling them they are broken and should live a celibate life for the purpose of changing or suppressing their same-sex attraction.” She went on to comment that, “While some religious practices may meet the definition of change or suppression practice in certain circumstances, the definition had been carefully crafted, and is not designed to capture all religious practices or teachings or to prevent people seeking religious counsel. For example, the definition of a change or suppression practice would not capture conduct where, for example, a person goes to a religious leader seeking advice on their feelings of same-sex attraction, and the religious leader only informs this person that they consider such feelings to be contrary to the teachings of their faith, and does so only to convey their interpretation of those teachings and not to change or suppress the person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.”

MP Jill Hennessy, who was Attorney General of Victoria until December 16, 2020. Source: Parliament of Victoria.
MP Jill Hennessy, who was Attorney General of Victoria until December 16, 2020. Source: Parliament of Victoria.

Victorian law requires a mandatory human rights evaluation of each law. In this case, the evaluation included the comment that, “Although broad, the definition has been carefully designed to exclude conduct that is not directed at an individual, to reduce its impact on religious practices such as sermons,” and that “general discussions of religious beliefs around sexual orientation or gender identity that aim to explain these beliefs and not change or suppress a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity” will remain permitted.

It is good that sermons remain protected, although Hennessy also said in her second reading speech that, “conduct generally directed—such as sermons expressing a general statement of belief—is not captured. However, such conduct may be considered as part of the Legislative Assembly’s ongoing inquiry into anti-vilification protections.”

However, with respect to persons who seek counsel and prayers for their individual case from their religious leaders, the concerns remain. It seems that, if a LGBTQ individual—but perhaps also somebody whose inclination is towards a number of contemporary sexual relations with persons of the opposite sex—visits a priest, pastor, or religious counselor seeking advice about sexuality, the latter has the right to explain in general that the teachings of his or her religion recommend that any sexual activity only takes place within the context of a monogamous marriage between a man and a woman. But, if the religious leader goes one step further, and urges the parishioner to change his or her conduct, this may be constructed as changing or suppressing the parishioner’s sexual orientation, and constituting a crime.

Note also the example given by the Attorney General, that suggesting to a homosexual person that she or he should “live a celibate life” would typically constitute the crime the new law tries to suppress. Although Catholic theologians and prelates have recently offered different positions and interpretations, the Catechism of the Catholic Church still teaches in its article 2359 that “homosexual persons are called to chastity,” and so are all unmarried Catholics for that matter. A priest loyal to article 2359, when consulted by a homosexual parishioner, can quote and explain the provision in general, but should refrain from applying it to the individual case before him. Clearly, during the daily pastoral practice, whether the forbidden line between general and particular has been crossed is almost impossible to establish.

The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne, Peter Comensoli, claimed that in its present text the law “targets prayer, and appears to impose silence on people of faith from sharing their beliefs in an open, honest and faithful way.”
The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Melbourne, Peter Comensoli, claimed that in its present text the law “targets prayer, and appears to impose silence on people of faith from sharing their beliefs in an open, honest and faithful way.”

Some churches in Victoria also complain that they had not been consulted before introducing a bill that clearly affect their normal pastoral activities. Most of the critics do not endorse quack conversion psychotherapies, nor do they condone the “deprogramming” of LGBTQ people (for the record, neither do I). What they ask is that, as did laws in other Australian states (a Queensland law, for instance, only mentions “mental health professionals” and seems to grant exceptions for religious counseling), the new bill should be amended to clarify that offering personal advice in accordance with the tenets of one religion to those who voluntarily seek it can never be considered a crime.

Tagged With: Australia, Religious Liberty

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Ley de Donaciones Religiosas de Japón. 1. Un texto ambiguo

    Ley de Donaciones Religiosas de Japón. 1. Un texto ambiguo

  • 日本の宗教献金法 4. 洗脳の復活

    日本の宗教献金法 4. 洗脳の復活

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

  • 日本の宗教献金法2. 「恐怖」と宗教的詐欺行為

    日本の宗教献金法2. 「恐怖」と宗教的詐欺行為

Keep Reading

  • Iran: “Christians Are Constantly Watched as Spies”
    Iran: “Christians Are Constantly Watched as Spies”

    A conversation with Pastor Dabrina Bet-Tamraz from Iran before she testified at the European Parliament in Brussels.

  • “Religious Abuse of Children”: Another Assault Against Freedom of Religion in Japan. 1. A New Notion of “Abuse”
    “Religious Abuse of Children”: Another Assault Against Freedom of Religion in Japan. 1. A New Notion of “Abuse”

    Guidelines by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare substantially limit parents’ rights to pass religious faith to their children.

  • « Maltraitance religieuse des enfants ». Une autre attaque contre la liberté religieuse au Japon. 1. Une nouvelle notion de « maltraitance ».
    « Maltraitance religieuse des enfants ». Une autre attaque contre la liberté religieuse au Japon. 1. Une nouvelle notion de « maltraitance ».

    Les directives du ministère de la Santé, du Travail et des Affaires sociales limitent considérablement le droit des parents de transmettre leur foi religieuse à leurs enfants.

  • Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text
    Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text

    The Japanese Parliament has passed laws regarding as fraudulent donations motivated by “fear” and where the “free will” of the donors has allegedly been suppressed.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses by Massimo Introvigne
  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • The Donnie Yen Fiasco: A Uyghur View by Rebiya Kadeer
  • The “Buddhist and Taoist Clergy Database,” Another CCP Imposture by He Yuyan
  • The Suicide of the Pink-Haired Girl: How the CCP Exploited a Tragedy by Zhou Kexin
  • Second-Generation Unification Church Believers Discriminated in Japan. 3. Media Slander Leads to Discrimination by Masumi Fukuda
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY