• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Featured Global

UK Supreme Court: Jehovah’s Witnesses Not Responsible for Rape Committed by a (then) Elder in a Non-Institutional Setting

05/01/2023Massimo Introvigne |

Religious organizations should not pay damages for crimes perpetrated by their leaders or members in private homes outside of church-organized religious activity, the court said.

by Massimo Introvigne

The UK Supreme Court. Credits.
The UK Supreme Court. Credits.

On April 26, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom issued an important decision on the question of vicarious liability by a religious organization for a crime committed by one of its elders in a non-institutional setting.

These cases have been hotly debated, not only in the United Kingdom. In several countries, courts have stated that a religious organization is liable for crimes committed by its leaders or employees in an institutional setting. For instance, several decisions in different countries affirm that if a Catholic priest sexually abuses a minor during a retreat or youth camp organized by the parish, the Catholic diocese or religious order is responsible and should pay damages to the victims. This is highly significant for the victims and their lawyers, as individual priests normally have very little assets while dioceses and religious orders are comparatively rich.

In Britain, since 2001, courts have significantly expanded the notion of vicarious liability, precisely because of the widespread concern about cases of sexual abuse. Vicarious liability does not only apply to religious organizations, nor only to sexual abuse. For example, corporations have been held liable to pay damages for tortious acts committed by their employees, and the government for incidents that happened in prisons.

However, even the broadened scope of vicarious liability in Britain is not unlimited. Determining vicarious liability involves two stages. First, the perpetrator of the tortious act (which may also be a crime) must be an employee, or in a relationship similar to that of an employee, of the organization against which damages are claimed. Second, a close connection must exist between this employment (or quasi-employment) relationship and the crime. For example, the UK Supreme Court has ruled that a doctor to whom a bank referred young prospective employees for a medical examination, and who sexually abused them, was not an employee of the bank, which was thus not liable for his crimes. The same UK Supreme Court ruled than the employee of a company who took home confidential data and leaked them to the media in pursuance of a personal vendetta against his employer was not acting within the authorized scope of its employment relationship with the company, which should not pay damages for his actions.

In the case “Trustees of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses (Appellant) v BXB (Respondent),” [2023] UKSC 15, the facts referred to two couples of Jehovah’s Witnesses, who were members of the same congregation and befriended each other, Mr. and Mrs. B., and Mark Sewell and his wife Mary. Mark Sewell was first a ministerial servant and then an elder in the congregation, although the friendship also originated from the fact that he and Mr. B. shared a business relationship.

Kingdom’s Hall of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses. From Twitter.
Kingdom’s Hall of the Barry Congregation of Jehovah’s Witnesses. From Twitter.

By 1989, Mark Sewell had developed serious problems of alcoholism and depression. He also started flirting with Mrs. B., who told him she was not interested. The Bs and Mark’s wife sought the counsel of Mark’s father, also an elder in the congregation, who allegedly recommended they remain close to his son and try to help him with his problems. However, Mark’s situation worsened. On April 30, 1990, after a quarrel with his wife, Mark had retreated to a back room of his home, alone. Mrs. B. went to speak to Mark, with the idea of persuading him to go to the elders and discuss his problems with them. Shortly after she had entered the back room, Mark assaulted and raped Mrs. B.

In 1993, Mrs. B., who had remained silent about the rape, learned that Mark had been accused of sexually molesting a minor. She then reported her case to the elders of the congregation. Mark lost his position as an elder, but was not immediately disfellowshipped, as evidence against him was regarded as insufficient. He was finally disfellowshipped in 1994 for reasons not related to Mrs. B.

In 2013, Mrs. B. heard of yet another charge against Mark and reported her case to the police. In 2014, Mark was sentenced to 14 years in jail for the rape of Mrs. B., who at that time was no longer one of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, and the indecent assault of two other victims.

In 2017, Mrs. B. sued the Jehovah’s Witnesses, claiming the organization was vicariously liable for her rape. She won at first instance in 2020 and on appeal in 2021. The judges did express some doubts as to whether the rape had a close connection with Mark’s relationship with the Jehovah’s Witnesses as an elder (thus a “quasi-employee” if not an employee of the organization), but read or rather misread the organization’s literature to conclude that an elder among the Jehovah’s Witnesses is in a position of great authority, and that abuse victims are either discouraged or put in a difficult position when they consider reporting his crimes.

The Supreme Court has now unanimously overturned the appeal decision, which had been widely criticized by legal scholars and academics. The Supreme Court observed that the first stage of vicarious liability was satisfied as Mark Sewell was in a position of quasi-employment with the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization, but not the second part of the test. The rape did not happen in an institutional setting, and was not closely connected with the fact that both the rapist and the victims were members of the same congregation of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, where Mark served as an elder. That Mark’s father, also an elder, had suggested that the Bs continue to see Mark and try to help him, the Supreme Court said, was irrelevant.

Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir, who signed the decision as President of the UK Supreme Court. Credits.
Robert Reed, Baron Reed of Allermuir, who signed the decision as President of the UK Supreme Court. Credits.

The Supreme Court found that “the rape was not committed while Mark Sewell was carrying out any activities as an elder on behalf of Jehovah’s Witnesses. He was at his own home and was not at the time engaged in performing any work connected with his role as an elder. So, for example, he was not conducting a bible class, he was not evangelizing or giving pastoral care, he was not on premises of the Jehovah’s Witnesses and the incident had nothing to do with any service or worship of the Jehovah’s Witnesses.” The case was thus substantially different from those where Catholic dioceses or religious orders were found liable for child sexual abuse committed by priests during pastoral activities organized by the Catholic Church.

The Supreme Court also found that “at the time of the rape, Mark Sewell was not exercising control over Mrs B because of his position as an elder. It was because of her close friendship with Mark Sewell and because she was seeking to provide emotional support to him, and not because Mark Sewell had control over her as an elder, that Mrs B went to the back room. The driving force behind their being together in the room at the time of the rape was their close personal friendship not Mark Sewell’s role as an elder. Put another way, the primary reason that the rape took place was not because Mark Sewell was abusing his position as an elder but because he was abusing his position as a close friend of Mrs B when she was trying to help him.”

The case is of great significance not only for Jehovah’s Witnesses but for other religious organizations as well. While respecting that the notion of vicarious liability has been expanded to offer better protection to victims of sexual abuse, the decision reacts against the idea that, particularly when dealing with religious organizations, vicarious liability can be expanded ad libitum. Religious organizations should bear responsibility for institutional abuse that happens during activities they promote and organize. They cannot be held liable for the behavior of their members and leaders in their private homes, in cases where, as the Supreme Court said, this “has nothing to do” with the activities of the religious group.

Tagged With: Jehovah’s Witnesses, Sexual Abuse, United Kingdom

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Is Netflix a Threat to Religious Liberty?

    Is Netflix a Threat to Religious Liberty?

  • Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 2. Odłączenie się i wykluczenie

    Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 2. Odłączenie się i wykluczenie

  • Pakistan, 6-year-old Hindu Girl Sexually Assaulted Amidst Sectarian Tensions

    Pakistan, 6-year-old Hindu Girl Sexually Assaulted Amidst Sectarian Tensions

  • Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 3 Unikanie kontaktów w teorii i praktyce

    Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 3 Unikanie kontaktów w teorii i praktyce

Keep Reading

  • Jehovas Zeugen: Vorwürfe des sexuellen Missbrauchs in Deutschland als haltlos entlarvt
    Jehovas Zeugen: Vorwürfe des sexuellen Missbrauchs in Deutschland als haltlos entlarvt

    Ein ehemaliges Mitglied und eine Zeitung beschuldigten sie des grausamen Missbrauchs. Sie baten einen Staatsanwalt um eine Untersuchung. Es wurden keine Beweise für Missbrauch gefunden.

  • Norvegija. Oslo Apygardos teismas sustabdo Jehovos liudytojų bendruomenės išregistravimo procesą
    Norvegija. Oslo Apygardos teismas sustabdo Jehovos liudytojų bendruomenės išregistravimo procesą

    Teismas nedelsdamas sustabdė drakonišką ir neteisėtą Oslo ir Vikeno apygardos gubernatorės sprendimą. Tačiau kova tęsiasi.

  • L’anti-sectarisme à la mode de Caen : Pour éviter un procès, la MIVILUDES s’exécute face à la Scientology
    L’anti-sectarisme à la mode de Caen : Pour éviter un procès, la MIVILUDES s’exécute face à la Scientology

    Confrontée à un procès, la mission gouvernementale française de lutte contre les sectes republie son rapport annuel en y incluant une réponse de l’Église de Scientology.

  • De slachtoffers de schuld geven: De schietpartij in Hamburg en de Jehovah’s getuigen
    De slachtoffers de schuld geven: De schietpartij in Hamburg en de Jehovah’s getuigen

    Zoals te voorspellen was, hebben antisekte-activisten zelfs het bloedbad in Duitsland op 9 maart schaamteloos benut om de Jehovah’s Getuigen aan te vallen.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Chinese Muslims Told Mosques Should Preach Communism Too by Ma Wenyan
  • Hebei: Friends Pray in Your Home, the CCP Cuts Off Your Water and Electricity by Lai Mingxia
  • China’s “Query System for Islamic, Catholic, and Christian Clergy,” Another Tool for Repression by He Yuyan
  • Christian Students Asked to Study 20th Congress and Celebrate “Heroes” Who Betrayed the Church by Zhang Chunhua
  • Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army by Massimo Introvigne
  • Filipino Catholic Priest Arrested for Slandering Unrecognized Marian Apparitions by Massimo Introvigne
  • Pakistan, Young Christian Sentenced to Death for Blasphemy by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY