The radio and its website perform an essential function in exposing the crimes of the CCP both in China and internationally. It should continue its precious work.
Human Rights
日本と宗教、「公共の福祉」というスキャンダル：１. 日本の国際的義務への背反
日本が憲法および法律において、「公共の福祉」の名のもとに宗教の活動を制限し、さらには抑圧できるという原則を維持することは、国際的義務に違反する。
Japan and Religion, the Scandal of “Public Welfare.” 1. Betraying Japan’s International Obligations
By keeping in its Constitution and laws the principle that religions may have their activities restricted and even be suppressed in the name of “public welfare,” Japan violates its international obligations.
Pakistan: Report Claims Religious Minorities’ Situation Is Becoming Worse
The Human Rights Commission of Pakistan notes that discrimination, forced conversion, blasphemy accusations, and violent attacks increased in 2023 and 2024.
Will China Become the Global Human Rights “Leader”?
Now that the US have left the UN Human Rights Council, China’s energetic efforts to increase its power within the body represent a serious global threat.
China Wins Again: 48 Uyghur Refugees Repatriated by Thailand
For more than a decade, they have been kept in horrible conditions by Thai authorities. Now they will meet their fate in China. How long can the international community tolerate this?
Trump on Ukraine and Russia: A Colossal Moral Failure
U.S. President Donald Trump reverses the concepts of good and evil, delivering a devastating blow to human rights, religious liberty, and democracy.
Asins pārliešana un Jehovas liecinieki:kāpēc Eiropas Cilvēktiesību tiesa pasludināja Spānijai nelabvēlīgu spriedumu
Lielā palāta vienbalsīgi nolēma, ka lemtspējīgam pilngadīgam pacientam ir tiesības atteikties no jebkādas medicīniskās ārstēšanas, ieskaitot asins pārliešanu.
Vereülekanded ja Jehoova tunnistajad: miks tegi Euroopa Inimõiguste Kohus otsuse Hispaania vastu
Suurkoda otsustas ühehäälselt, et pädeval täiskasvanud patsiendil on õigus keeldu-da mis tahes ravist, sealhulgas vereülekandest.
Rada OSN pre ľudské práva: Publikácie Jehovových svedkov, ktoré učia o „obmedzení kontaktu“, by sa nemali zakazovať
Rusko označilo dve publikácie za „extrémistické“. Rada OSN pre ľudské práva (HRC) uviedla, že zákaz porušuje článok 18 Medzinárodného paktu o občianskych a politických právach.