• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / Featured Global

Spanish Supreme Court: Political Parties Cannot Exclude “Cult” Devotees as Candidates

12/31/2022Massimo Introvigne |

The judges sanctioned the Podemos party for its discrimination of members based on the sole reason that they belonged to the Prometheus Initiatory School.

by Massimo Introvigne

Germán Martín Castro, “Prometeus.” From Twitter.
Germán Martín Castro, “Prometeus.” From Twitter.

Recently, the grounds were published of a decision rendered by the Spanish Supreme Court on October 18, 2022, which will no doubt become an important international precedent. It establishes that political parties cannot discriminate against their own members who have not been found guilty of any crime only because they belong to a movement the media and its opponents regard as a “cult” (“secta” in Spanish).

Germán Martín Castro was born in Cabañaquinta, Asturias, on September 29, 1930. A medical doctor, he wrote several esoteric books under the pseudonym of “Prometeus,” claiming he was a messenger transmitting the wisdom of the “Higher Cosmic Brothers.”

In 1968, he established the Escuela Iniciática Prometeus (Prometheus Initiatory School). The school’s teachings are based on Kabbalah, with elements from Theosophy and Anthroposophy. For those who have completed the basic courses, Prometeus proposes an initiation into what Castro calls “magico-sexual activity,” which is based on the sacred eroticism teachings found in some Kabbalistic texts and other sources from Western esotericism. Not surprisingly, Castro and Prometeus have been attacked by anti-cultists and Catholic critics of the “sectas.”

Masculine-feminine evolutionary path according to Prometeus. From Twitter.
Masculine-feminine evolutionary path according to Prometeus. From Twitter.

Podemos (“We Can”) is a Spanish left-wing political party, which was founded in 2014, obtained its best electoral results in 2016 with 21.15% of the national votes, and is currently part of the coalition supporting the government of Socialist Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, to which it contributes two cabinet ministers.

Prometeus went through a reorganization in 2017, but the case decided by the Supreme Court happened in 2015. Prometeus has its own political organization, called Unión Integral y Democrática de Todos los Pueblos (Integral and Democratic Union of All Peoples), whose Madrid branch is called MID, Madrid Integral y Democrático (Integral and Democratic Madrid). These are anti-capitalist and left-wing organizations, centered on the utopian proposal of a World Constitution and advocating the union of leftist parties and movements in Spain.

When Podemos was organized, a sizeable number of Madrid members of MID joined it. On March 15, 2015, those MID members of Podemos asked to compete in the Party’s primary elections aimed at selecting its candidates for Madrid’s City Council through a list called “Madrid Integral y Democrático.”

It took only twenty-four hours to Podemos to reject the list on March 16, based on the fact that the MID was one and the same with Prometeus, that its members, if elected, would have advanced Prometeus’ interests rather than Podemos’, and that the religious and esoteric ideas of Prometeus were incompatible with the secular humanist principle of “laicismo” on which Podemos is based. Clearly, the fact that Prometeus had been branded a “cult” by anti-cultists and the media carried a weight in the decision.

Appeals to the higher bodies of Podemos were also quickly rejected, on March 20 and 27, 2015. The Prometeus members of Podemos then sued the party before the Justice Court of Madrid but lost in first degree on December 20, 2015, and on appeal on September 4, 2019, which led them to file a recourse with Spain’s Supreme Court.

The first- and second-degree judges wrote they had to balance the political freedom of a party to organize itself as it deems fit and the religious liberty of these Prometeus devotees who had become members of Podemos. They concluded that a party may decide to exclude those who do not respect its by-laws and principles, and that when they joined Podemos the Prometeus members knew that the party embraces “laicismo” as part of its political ideology.

When the Supreme Court decided the case, the Madrid city elections were long past. However, the judges believed they should rule on the general principle. The first argument by the Prometeus devotees, that they were excluded without a due process where they could have presented their defenses, was rejected. In fact, the Supreme Court determined that, although quickly because the elections were imminent, the Prometeus members had been heard by the organs of Podemos.

However, the Supreme Court accepted the second argument of Prometeus devotees, based on freedom of religion or belief. It observed that, while private associations and even religious organizations may exclude certain categories from membership (in fact, in December 2021 the same Supreme Court had stated that a Catholic lay association may legitimately exclude women), political parties are a special case. They are not merely private associations. “Political parties, they wrote, are constitutionally qualified associations, which occupy a dominant position in the field of political participation.” A party’s right to self-organize itself is not without limits. Parties “should be democratic” and respect human rights, including freedom of religion or belief.

The Spanish Supreme Court, Madrid. Credits.
The Spanish Supreme Court, Madrid. Credits.

Also based on precedents of the European Court of Human Rights, the Spanish Supreme Court acknowledged that political parties may have an official doctrine or ideology, and exclude members who openly disagree with it. However, it said that parties cannot simply assume that members of a certain religion or spiritual group would violate their values for the mere fact of being devotees of that group.

The first argument used by Podemos to exclude the Prometeus candidates was that, if elected, they would advance the interests of their esoteric movement rather than of the party.

The Supreme Court countered that, “The consideration that the mere ascription of an affiliate to a religious denomination or to an institution in which the external and collective dimension of a certain belief of another nature is channeled (as is the case of an esoteric school for those who profess such esoteric beliefs) implies that, in the event of holding an elected office, the affiliates will defend ‘personal, economic or political interests unrelated to the elected office in question,’ with the consequence that they cannot participate in the primary election processes of the political party, constitutes an excessive and unjustified restriction of the members’ freedom of belief.”

As for secular humanism or “laicismo,” the court examined documents of Podemos stating that the party welcomes believers of all religions as members, and only excludes those who are against the principle of separation of church and state. There is no evidence, the court said, that the left-wing political ideas of Prometeus-MID members deny this principle.

“Without a reasonable justification of the contradiction between the beliefs of the members and the ideological and programmatic principles of the party, which in this case has not been offered, limiting the right of participation of the members in the functioning and internal organization of the party, specifically in the primary elections, for professing certain beliefs, constitutes a relevant limitation of their rights of participation that negatively affects their freedom of belief, since these beliefs are the cause for which their rights are limited, without this being justified by the need for ideological coherence of the political party.”

Parties can exclude those who profess beliefs clearly incompatible with their core doctrines. But they cannot assume that, just because they are members of a group stigmatized as a “cult” by some, they are a threat to the “ideological coherence” of a party. The contradiction between the beliefs of a party members and the party’s stated ideology should be proved rather than assumed and, the Supreme Court adds, proved for each individual devotee. Otherwise, the party violates freedom of religion or belief, something it cannot do in a democratic system.

Tagged With: Anti-Cult, Religious Liberty, Spain

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

  • « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».

    « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».

  • Anti-Cultists Blame “Ukraine-Funded Theosophical Cult” for Russian Protests Against the War

    Anti-Cultists Blame “Ukraine-Funded Theosophical Cult” for Russian Protests Against the War

  • Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 1. Ratzinger and Lefebvre

    Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 1. Ratzinger and Lefebvre

Keep Reading

  • Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 4. Seeking a Theoretical Foundation for Freedom of Religion
    Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 4. Seeking a Theoretical Foundation for Freedom of Religion

    The German Pope’s argument for a theological and philosophical foundation of freedom of religion did not persuade everybody, but remains a crucial reference.

  • Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text
    Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text

    The Japanese Parliament has passed laws regarding as fraudulent donations motivated by “fear” and where the “free will” of the donors has allegedly been suppressed.

  • Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 2. “Reform in the Continuity”
    Benedict XVI and Religious Liberty. 2. “Reform in the Continuity”

    The German Pope never claimed that between the old and the new Catholic teachings on religious liberty there was perfect continuity. But he said the reform was not a “rupture.”

  • European Court of Human Rights: Governments Should Not Call Minority Religions “Cults”
    European Court of Human Rights: Governments Should Not Call Minority Religions “Cults”

    The Court ruled in favor of three Bulgarian Evangelical churches, and said its case law has “evolved” since it refused to censor two French report on “cults” in 2001.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY