• Skip to main content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / China / Op-eds China

Are the Media Responsible for the Uyghur Genocide, Too?

11/17/2022Marco Respinti |

In the present Uyghur crisis, media are often not the solution but the problem.

by Marco Respinti*

*A paper prepared for the author’s presentation and discussion at the November 9, 2022, panel “International Civil Society and Media Responses to the Genocide in East Turkistan,” during the International Uyghur Forum in Brussels, Belgium, on November 9-10, 2022, hosted by the World Uyghur Congress, HASENE International, International Union of East Turkistan Organizations, with the co-sponsorship of the Unrepresented Nations and Peoples Organization, Society for Threatened Peoples, CCJO René Cassin, FAIR International, and the International Society for Human Rights.

International Uyghur Forum in Brussels. The opening session of the Forum. From Twitter.
The opening session of the Forum. From Twitter.

Media are what their Latin name says: means to connect two otherwise distant terms. Means of mass communication bridge sources and people through what we call “news,” literally “novelties.” Media bear a high responsibility: they are means (with others) that lead to knowledge and then to action.

So, accuracy should be the first duty of the media. This has of course to do with truth. Working in the media, with the media, and through the media requires high moral standards and the will to search for truth.

This is totally evident when it comes to the Uyghur crisis, and more in general to the Chinese Communist Party’s misdeeds. Media are, or should be, the means through which the general public knows about these topics, leading politicians and ultimately governments to act.

An Italian social commentator, the late Giovanni Cantoni (1938–2020), used wittily to say that if your history is wrong, your politics will be wrong as well. This is surely true, as it is true that those who receive bad or wrong information get distorted ideas on history and current affairs, and consequently act badly or wrongly in the public sphere.

Today, facts and comments on the Uyghur crisis are easily available through many sources. Most of this information is of high quality. There are reports, pictures, and videos; there are testimonies; there are political acts and pieces of legislation; there are entire dedicated web sites. Everyone can access this truth for free. This shows that NGOs, civil society, and researchers are doing a major work in bringing accuracy to the public, sometime even at a scholarly level. It also demonstrates that many journalists perform their duty with professionalism, conscience, and morality.

But one thing that does not cease to puzzle me every single day is that, in spite of this huge amount of important and well-researched information and public action, including by parliaments, the general public still does not know much about the Uyghur crises, or even about the Uyghurs themselves. Most importantly, too many politicians and governments do not act in the right way on this quite serious problem.

Why? I work as a journalist: so, my initial, partial answer today focuses on my colleagues in the media.

The first half of my answer today is that basically many media miss the point. This is a polite way to put a daring question. What I in fact mean is that too many of my colleagues just shamefully repeat one version or another of the propaganda of the CCP. This brings discredit to the journalistic profession but is not an exaggeration. “Bitter Winter” often reports about this complicity between some Western journalists (and even fake journalists) and the Chinese propaganda machine. At the end of the day, what we get here is some corrupted media people that on the uneven days of a week undo what other serious journalists try to achieve with information on the even days of the same week.

The second half of my answer of today is a more nuanced side of this same story. I point here to another form of unprofessional attitude common in media. Some journalists just renounce, out of laziness and sloppy habits, to challenge the ruling elite. I think this is the most important single point.

Repeating that media are the watchdog of democracy may seem a platitude. But platitudes often retain a grain of important truth at their core. A free society is based on a clear distinction among the powers of the state, the consent of the governed, the rule of law, a healthy and vital civil society, as well as a free press.

Now, the press is free if and when it challenges the powers that be. In face of the Uyghur crisis and the misdeeds of the CCP, a real journalist should never be tired to raise questions, to ask for more, to want details, to look for answers even if it costs labour and time and homework. Independent media should challenge governments and politicians every single day. They should systematically question trade agreements between whatever country and China, cooperation pacts with Beijing, partnerships with the Chinese neo-post-national-communist regime in all fields.

True journalism should raise the price daily, calling the CCP-led regime to respond clearly and immediately on its violations of natural law and human rights, on the real state of religious liberty, on the fate of threatened cultural identities. Newspapers and news-services, especially in the West, should be filled with articles demanding truth from the Chinese regime, and asking democratic politicians why and how and what are the terms of the agreements their respective countries have signed with the tyrannical government of China, which has transformed East Turkestan/Xinjiang into a gigantic, open-air reeducation camp. In spite of the good work done, we still see too little of this.

A moment of the Forum. From Twitter.
A moment of the Forum. From Twitter.

I come from a country, Italy, whose government signed a “Memorandum of Understanding” with China in March 2019. In spite of many promises by subsequent governments, it hasn’t been neither revised nor (as it should be) cancelled yet. Practically, it was and still is a blank check given by Italy to China at the expenses of my homeland and taxpayers. That Agreement has of course bound Italian politics but has also compelled Italian media, including Italian state media, to literally buy the most blatant propaganda fabricated by the Chinese regime. Things have partially changed recently, but is still largely a functioning shame.

Now, guess why many in Italy still say that using the term “genocide” for the treatment that the CCP reserves for Uyghurs is an unbearable exaggeration; that things all over China are instead transparent and good, even ideal; that independent media like “Bitter Winter” and others lie when they denounce the systematic breaking of Uyghur families, the many instances of rape, out of hatred, of Uyghur women, the staggering policy of sterilization imposed on Uyghur mothers by the CCP, the shameful practice of organ harvesting that the CCP is lately bringing to the Uyghur people too, the concentration and slave labor camps where Uyghurs are sent, the systematic religious persecution of the Uyghur people and the vicious war against Uyghur cultural identity, and indeed all things Uyghur, that the “neo-Maoist for the New Era” President Xi Jinping is waging.

Guess why politicians are shy, guess why governments still ignore the problem, guess why policies are inadequate.

In his 1981 Inaugural Address, American President Ronald Reagan (1911–2004) said: “In this present crises, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.” Let me paraphrase that great statesman: in the present Uyghur crisis, media are often not the solution; media are the problem.

As long as they remain a problem, the Uyghur crisis would stall because the civil society would have an excuse for its uncivil ignorance. Governments and politicians, who potentially may hold the key to a solution, will not be properly poked and prodded. Today, November 9, marks the 33rd anniversary of the Fall of the Berlin Wall. It is the right occasion for many media professionals to wonder why, with the iron curtain gone, the bamboo curtain is still there, and ask themselves whether they bear any responsibility for that.

Tagged With: Genocide, Muslim Uyghurs

Marco Respinti
Marco Respinti

Marco Respinti is an Italian professional journalist, member of the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), essayist, translator, and lecturer. He has contributed and contributes to several journals and magazines both in print and online, both in Italy and abroad. Author of books and chapter in books, he has translated and/or edited works by, among others, Edmund Burke, Charles Dickens, T.S. Eliot, Russell Kirk, J.R.R. Tolkien, Régine Pernoud and Gustave Thibon. A Senior fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (a non-partisan, non-profit U.S. educational organization based in Mecosta, Michigan), he is also a founding member as well as a member of the Advisory Council of the Center for European Renewal (a non-profit, non-partisan pan-European educational organization based in The Hague, The Netherlands). A member of the Advisory Council of the European Federation for Freedom of Belief, in December 2022, the Universal Peace Federation bestowed on him, among others, the title of Ambassador of Peace. From February 2018 to December 2022, he has been the Editor-in-Chief of International Family News. He serves as Director-in-Charge of the academic publication The Journal of CESNUR and Bitter Winter: A Magazine on Religious Liberty and Human Rights.

Related articles

  • Incorrigible Hikvision: Despite Denials, It Continues to Supply Uyghur Recognition Software

    Incorrigible Hikvision: Despite Denials, It Continues to Supply Uyghur Recognition Software

  • Why Did Xi Jinping Mention a “Hard-Won Stability” in Xinjiang?

    Why Did Xi Jinping Mention a “Hard-Won Stability” in Xinjiang?

  • “Waiting to Be Arrested at Night”: Tahir Hamut Izgil’s New Book is a Testament to Uyghur Indomitable Spirit

    “Waiting to Be Arrested at Night”: Tahir Hamut Izgil’s New Book is a Testament to Uyghur Indomitable Spirit

  • Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang Denounced at the United Nations—Again

    Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang Denounced at the United Nations—Again

Keep Reading

  • Desperate Divorces: Another CCP Crimes Against the Uyghurs
    Desperate Divorces: Another CCP Crimes Against the Uyghurs

    When one Uyghur is detained, the spouse is regarded as suspect and detained too, and children are given for adoption. To save the children, the spouse not yet detained quickly files for divorce.

  • Liu Jianchao: Notorious Human Rights Violator Received with Honors in UK
    Liu Jianchao: Notorious Human Rights Violator Received with Honors in UK

    Activists protested the UK’s red carpet treatment for one of the key authors of China’s transnational repression

  • Xi Jinping Claims Repression in Xinjiang Is Not Harsh Enough
    Xi Jinping Claims Repression in Xinjiang Is Not Harsh Enough

    Xi went to Urumqi with all the CCP top leaders. He told local authorities that “illegal religious activities” have not been eradicated and Uyghurs have not been fully “Sinicized.”

  • The Hague Human Rights Film Festival: Movies Vindicate Persecuted Women
    The Hague Human Rights Film Festival: Movies Vindicate Persecuted Women

    The second annual Global Human Rights Defence’s Human Rights Film Festival in The Hague presented the sufferings of Tajik, Yazidi, Ahmadi, Pakistani, Uyghur, and other women.

Primary Sidebar

Follow us

Newsletter

MOST READ

  • Crimes Against Humanity in Xinjiang Denounced at the United Nations—Again by Ruth Ingram
  • The False Panchen Lama Tells Tibetans to Obey Xi Jinping Unconditionally by Lopsang Gurung
  • The Two Sides of Elon Musk: A Uyghur View by Kok Bayraq
  • Iraq: Beware of Rayan al-Kildani and his “Christian” Babylon Movement by Willy Fautré
  • France: Rémi Mogenet, a Victim of Anti-Cultism, Testifies by Massimo Introvigne
  • The Unification Church Issue in Japan: A Japanese Christian Theologian Speaks. 1. Lies About Abe’s Relations with the Church by Haruhisa Nakagawa
  • All Roads Lead to Rome: Two “Official” Chinese Bishops Will Attend the Catholic Synod by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY