• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / Featured Global

The Great Witch Hunt Against the Unification Church in Japan. 2. How to Destroy a Church

11/08/2022Massimo Introvigne |

An unprecedented probe is being started with the stated aim of dissolving the Unification Church in Japan.

by Massimo Introvigne

Article 2 of 3. Read article 1.

Prime Minister Kishida announced a law would “support the victims” of the Unification Church. Screenshot.
Prime Minister Kishida announced a law would “support the victims” of the Unification Church. Screenshot.

In the first article of this series, I described the growing intolerance against the Unification Church (now called Family Federation for World Peace and Unification, FFWPU) in Japan after the assassination of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Intolerance’s political role is to prepare discrimination, i.e., legal and administrative measures targeting an unpopular minority.

The Religious Corporation Act (RCA) of Japan allows for an administrative investigation of religious bodies that may result in a litigation aimed at the dissolution of the relevant religious organization under Article 81 RCA. The dissolution is allowed when a religious corporation has “committed acts that are clearly found to substantially harm public welfare in violation of laws and regulations” and has “substantially deviated” from the typical purposes of a religious organization. An administrative investigation is allowed when a cause of dissolution is suspected to exist.

There have been two cases of such dissolution in the past in Japan. In both cases, the religious organizations had been found guilty of criminal activities by Japanese court of law in criminal cases. When opponents started claiming that a similar probe should be conducted against the FFWPU, Prime Minister Kishida wisely told the Lower House Budget Committee on October 18 that neither the FFWPU nor its legal representatives or leaders had been convicted of any crime. He also confirmed that violations of provisions of the Civil Code ascertained by courts in civil (as opposite to criminal) cases are not included among the “violations of laws” that may be a cause for dissolution.

However, his statement was vocally criticized by the anti-Unification-Church lobby and the media, whose pressure led Kishida just one day later, on October 19, to reverse his earlier statement and claim that a religious body can be investigated and dissolved even if it has been found guilty of objectionable practices in civil rather than in criminal cases.

The Prime Minister has indicated he had changed his mind based on the calls received by the hotline set up after the Abe assassination to receive complaints against the Unification Church. However, these complaints are recorded but not verified (anybody can call, with a true or false story), and the government’s own data indicate that they largely refer to incidents that allegedly happened several years ago. On the other hand, the complaints submitted to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs before the Abe assassination concerning the Unification Church had continuously decreased, from 229 in 2012 to less than 100 since 2015 and less than 30 in 2021.

The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology has thus announced that it will start a probe of the FFWPU and may then commence a litigation seeking a dissolution order. The “acts harming public welfare” justifying such and order are the alleged “spiritual sales” and the mistreatment of second-generation members, based on stories such as the one by “Ogawa” I discussed in the previous article of this series.

On October 25, according to media reports, “The Cultural Affairs Agency started collecting the opinions of experts before it launches an official probe of the Unification Church that could lead to its dissolution.”

“Expert panel” convenes preparing the probe that may lead to the dissolution of the FFWPU. Screenshot.
“Expert panel” convenes preparing the probe that may lead to the dissolution of the FFWPU. Screenshot.

The FFWPU is a law-abiding organization, and its Japanese branch has already stated that it will answer any question the authorities may have and supply any requested document. I am not a member of the FFWPU, however, and feel at liberty to state that the probe is grossly unfair and violates several provisions of international human rights law.

First, as mentioned earlier, before the Abe assassination the Ministry of Consumer Affairs collected complaints about possibly fraudulent practices of religious organizations. In 2021, more than 98% of the complaints concerned groups other than the Unification Church/FFWPU. The only reason to single out the FFWPU now is that the pressures of the anti-Unification-Church lobby and the media created a political and electoral problem for the government. However, the fact that a group is unpopular and that “public opinion” (which is easily manipulated by media in turn influenced by lobbies) is in favor of its persecution does not justify a crackdown.

Second, probing in view of requesting its dissolution a religious organization that has not been found guilty of any crime is unprecedented in Japan’s legal history and contrasts with Japan’s ICCPR obligations with respect to freedom of religion or belief, as Prime Minister Kishida himself originally stated before being put under pressure to change his mind.

Third, the fact that the FFWPU has been singled out for special hostile treatment and the attitude of politicians is a pointer to the fact that the FFWPU can hardly expect fair treatment and a serious consideration of its defenses. Rather than being presumed innocent, the FFWPU is presumed guilty from the very beginning of the process.

Tagged With: Japan, Unification Church

Related articles

  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing

    Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing

  • Die Anti-Vereinigungskirchen-Kampagne in Japan: Der Schatten der Kommunistischen Partei

    Die Anti-Vereinigungskirchen-Kampagne in Japan: Der Schatten der Kommunistischen Partei

  • Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 3. An American Precedent

    Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 3. An American Precedent

  • Partidos comunistas y religión: la “guerra final” del Partido Comunista Japonés contra la Iglesia de la Unificación

    Partidos comunistas y religión: la “guerra final” del Partido Comunista Japonés contra la Iglesia de la Unificación

Keep Reading

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 3. Ein amerikanischer Präzedenzfall
    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 3. Ein amerikanischer Präzedenzfall

    Im Jahr 1931 stellte der Oberste Gerichtshof von Kalifornien in dem bahnbrechenden Fall „People vs. Blackburn“ fest, dass die Behauptung eines inspirierten religiösen Wissens und das Sammeln von Spenden selbst für eine marginale religiöse Bewegung Teil der Religionsfreiheit ist.

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text
    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

    Das japanische Parlament hat Gesetze verabschiedet, die Spenden als betrügerisch einstufen, die durch „Angst“ motiviert sind und bei denen der „freie Wille“ der Spender angeblich unterdrückt wurde.

  • Ley de Donaciones Religiosas de Japón. 1. Un texto ambiguo
    Ley de Donaciones Religiosas de Japón. 1. Un texto ambiguo

    El Parlamento japonés ha aprobado leyes que consideran fraudulentas las donaciones motivadas por el “miedo” y en las que supuestamente se ha suprimido el “libre albedrío” de los donantes.

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz . 2. „Angst“ und religiöser Betrug
    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz . 2. „Angst“ und religiöser Betrug

    Das neue Gesetz verbietet Spenden, die auf „Angst vor Unglück in diesem oder im nächsten Leben und auf dem Vertrauen in „inspirierte“ Lehrer beruhen, und stellt damit alle Religionen unter Verdacht.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY