• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / China / Featured China

Party History Study: Xi Jinping’s Main Campaign in 2021

04/07/2021Massimo Introvigne |

All Chinese are mobilized. But “history,” Xi explains, in a Marxist context, has not the same meaning it has in a bourgeois academia.

by Massimo Introvigne

Xi Jinping visiting the Memorial Hall of the First Congress of the Communist Party of China in Shanghai. Source: Chinese government Web site.
Xi Jinping visiting the Memorial Hall of the First Congress of the Communist Party of China in Shanghai. Source: Chinese government Web site.

Chinese media in these weeks are dominated by “Party History Study,” which is required homework for all Chinese in the year 2021, which marks the 100th anniversary of the foundation of the Chinese Communist Party. The whole country is mobilized to learn the history of the CCP. Not only in schools, but in offices, factories, and pretty much everywhere there will be exams testing the proficiency citizens have achieved in learning CCP’s history.

The March 31/April 1 issue of Qiushi, the official ideological magazine of the CCP, has published the full text of a speech Xi Jinping delivered at a “Mobilization Conference on Party History Study and Education,” held on February 20, 2021.

“Party history is the most vivid, the most persuasive textbook,” Xi said. This may sound very poetic, but it is important to understand what he means with “history.”

Marxist history, Xi explained, should not be confused with bourgeois history. “We must persist in using historical materialism” when presenting history. As “the largest Marxist party in the world,” when the CCP deals with history, it should do it in a Marxist way. “History has created the CCP,” Xi said, and it is now time for the CCP to create its own history.

“During its 100-year struggle, our Party has always analyzed and grasped the general historical trend with the basic principles of Marxism,” and it should continue to do so, Xi insisted.

What is historical materialism? It is Marx’s grand theory of history, interpreting everything through the lenses of relations of production and class struggle. It is ideological history, in the sense that first, the ideology is presented as absolutely true, then facts are ordered and made to fit the Procrustean bed of the ideological scheme. It is also teleological history, since there is no uncertainty, and we know exactly what the denouement will be. Communism will win, and capitalism will lose.

Xi Jinping reminded the Chinese that Marx’s scheme should be rigidly followed. The Party History Study campaign is not about some bourgeois investigation of documents and archives, as a western academic historian would do. Its aim is to “comprehend the power of ideology and increase the political consciousness” of the Chinese. “Marxism, Xi said, is a powerful ideological weapon for us to understand the world, grasp the laws, pursue the truth, and transform the world. It is the guiding ideology that our party and country must always follow.” Making and studying history “cannot be for a moment without theoretical thinking, or without ideological guidance.” The campaign should be guided by party executives, who will be above the academics.

Also, Marx has already revealed the direction of world history. It is not something historians can further discuss or argue about. “The law and general trend of historical development” have already been established. Xi assured us that “Marx and Engels scientifically revealed the historical law that socialism will inevitably replace capitalism.”

Adhering to this perspective is not a question of seeking empirical evidence. Bourgeois history leads to “historical nihilism.” It is, first, a question of obedience, as Xi makes abundantly clear that those who would use a different historical methodology would be punished, and second, a question of faith. The use by Xi of religious terminology and metaphors is significant. He uses the word “miracle” several times, to celebrate how Marxism achieved its victory in China, of all countries and despite what Marx himself would have considered unfavorable historical conditions. This passage of his speech is among the most interesting: “Faith is of the utmost importance at all times. The belief in Communism […] is the political soul of the Communists, and the spiritual pillar for the Communists to withstand any test.” “Belief,” “faith,” “soul” and “spiritual” are all used in the same sentence.

In applying these principles to the birth of the Communist Party in 1921, Xi also offered a general scheme, which is known from his other writings and speeches. It insists on how China, once the greatest civilization in the world, was victimized, “enslaved,” and humiliated by the West. “The Taiping Heavenly Kingdom Movement, the Westernization Movement, the Reform Movement of 1898, the Boxer Movement, and the Revolution of 1911” were valuable, if unsuccessful, attempts to save the nation. Paradoxically, but not without precedents in CCP historiography, the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom of the 19th century, a messianic new religious movement whose leader proclaimed himself the brother of Jesus Christ, launching the bloodiest civil war in human history, one that may have caused up to 70 million deaths, is regarded as a somewhat well-intentioned, if failed, social rebellion rather than the ultimate xie jiao or “cult.”

But, Xi said, the Taiping and the other reformist or revolutionary movements “all ended in failure and failed to change the tragic fate of the Chinese people and the Chinese nation.” Only “the blast of the October Revolution [in Russia] brought Marxism-Leninism to China. This was like a glow in the dark, pointing out the direction for the Chinese advanced elements who were struggling to find the way to save the country and the people, and the Chinese Communist Party came into being.”

Subsequent Party history should be studied by showing that the CCP’s successes came when it was guided with an iron hand. What Chinese should learn from Party history is that “maintaining the authority of the Party Central Committee and centralized and unified leadership must not remain in words, but must be reflected in actions.”

The campaign is also aimed at purging the field of history from “wrong tendencies” and the use of “illegal overseas publications” (meaning the works of western academics). “Historical materialism is the fundamental method for us Communists to understand and grasp history. If the concept of history is wrong, not only will it fail to achieve the goal of learning and education, but on the contrary, it will go the wrong way and go into a misunderstanding,” Xi explained. Adding that such “misunderstandings” will not go unpunished.

Tagged With: Chinese Communist Party, Xi Jinping

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Wang Yi’s Visit to Italy: A Missed Opportunity

    Wang Yi’s Visit to Italy: A Missed Opportunity

  • “Socialist Spiritual Civilization”: The Great Comeback of an Old CCP Concept

    “Socialist Spiritual Civilization”: The Great Comeback of an Old CCP Concept

  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media”

    China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media”

  • The Digital China 2023 Plan: Is There Something New?

    The Digital China 2023 Plan: Is There Something New?

Keep Reading

  • No Sex Please, We’re Chinese: Crackdown on the Oldest Student Sexology Association in China
    No Sex Please, We’re Chinese: Crackdown on the Oldest Student Sexology Association in China

    The Undergraduate Sexology Association of Central China Normal University in Wuhan was told the CCP suspects “foreign infiltrations” when sex is studied.

  • Burning Effigies: China Threatens American Academic Miles Yu
    Burning Effigies: China Threatens American Academic Miles Yu

    A Cultural-Revolution-style statue vilifies a scholar who has mightily upset the Communist Party.

  • “Butcher of Tibetans” Zhao Erfeng Celebrated by the CCP
    “Butcher of Tibetans” Zhao Erfeng Celebrated by the CCP

    The early 20th-century Qing bureaucrat is mostly remembered for his crimes against humanity. In Xi Jinping’s China, he is hailed as a model.

  • Qu’ran Burns in Sweden: China Protests—Hypocritically
    Qu’ran Burns in Sweden: China Protests—Hypocritically

    China’s protest against the burning of the Qu’ran in Stockholm is just propaganda. The CCP offends Islam daily in much worse ways in the Uyghur homeland.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses by Massimo Introvigne
  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • The Suicide of the Pink-Haired Girl: How the CCP Exploited a Tragedy by Zhou Kexin
  • Censorship Frenzy: Do Not Search for “2952” in China or You Will Get Into Trouble  by Tan Liwei
  • Empowering the Next Generation of Uyghurs to Challenge China’s Genocide by Marco Respinti
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne
  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media” by Zhou Kexin

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY