• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / News Global

Missouri: Bologna Sandwiches Not Protected by Religious Liberty

08/10/2021Massimo Introvigne |

New Life Evangelical Center loses cases where it challenged the prohibition to distribute the popular baloney sandwich to the homeless without a food permit.

by Massimo Introvigne

Bologna Sandwich

Feeding the poor is part of religious liberty, but not if you feed them bologna sandwiches, also known as baloney sandwiches, without a food permit. This is the conclusion reached on July 22, 2021, by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, which found against New Life Evangelical Center, a Christian charity.

New Life volunteers feed the St. Louis homeless several days per week, in addition to distributing clothing, gloves, and blankets, and religious material. They decided to include bologna sandwiches because they “are more filling and provide the recipient a balance of fats, carbohydrates, and protein which, otherwise, the
hungry persons might not have available to them.”

To sell or distribute for free in St. Louis non-prepackaged “salads or sandwiches containing meat, egg, poultry, or fish,” including bologna sandwiches, you need a temporary food permit, which, the city claims, protects the health and hygiene of the citizens.

New Life volunteers did not have such a permit, and were stopped in their bologna sandwich distributions by the police and threatened with arrest. New Life sued the city, claiming that distributing adequate food to the homeless is part of what they perceive as their religious mandate, and the city is interfering with their freedom of religion.

Interestingly, the Court relied on the historical Smith case without mentioning the recent Fulton Supreme Court decision that, while stopping short at overruling Smith, found in favor of Catholic nuns operating a foster care agency that was denied a contract with the City of Philadelphia, because of its religiously motivated refusal to serve same-sex couples. The Fulton decision was quoted by the Supreme Court in a recent case about hygiene, where a group of Amish families was allowed to refuse the installation of modern septic tanks that they claim are prohibited by their theology.

In the New Life case, the judges applied the Smith principle that general provisions that incidentally and unwillingly create a burden to religious activities do not violate religious liberty and remain enforceable. New Life argued that “the Ordinance’s various requirements to obtain a permit impermissibly restrict Plaintiffs’ ability to fulfill their religious obligation to share food with hungry persons, and that they cannot reasonably comply with the City’s permitting and regulatory requirements. For example, they share food three to five days per week, and to obtain a permit to continue this practice would cost roughly $7,500 per year.”

In fact, precisely because of the New Life case, this cost was lowered by the city, which introduced reduced fees for charities distributing food to the poor, a circumstance the court considered.

The judges also concluded that “there is nothing about bologna sandwiches specifically that inherently expresses their [New Life’s] religion,” and that New Life can continue to carry out its mission to the homeless by distributing other kinds of food for which a permit is not required.

Whether the homeless may prefer bologna sandwiches to, say, vegetarian pizza was not really considered.

Tagged With: Evangelical Churches, Religious Liberty, USA

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • For Christmas, Remember Religious Liberty

    For Christmas, Remember Religious Liberty

  • Religious Freedom Violations: Do Not Forget Cuba

    Religious Freedom Violations: Do Not Forget Cuba

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 3. Ein amerikanischer Präzedenzfall

    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 3. Ein amerikanischer Präzedenzfall

  • Hvorfor mediene hater «sekter»

    Hvorfor mediene hater «sekter»

Keep Reading

  • California and Confession. 1. A Catholic Victory—Which Did Not Solve All Problems
    California and Confession. 1. A Catholic Victory—Which Did Not Solve All Problems

    In 2019, Catholics managed to stop a draft law that would have opened a breach in the confessional privilege. But they left a problem unsolved.

  • La crise de l'Église de l'Unification au Japon : Les trois ennemis de la liberté religieuse
    La crise de l'Église de l'Unification au Japon : Les trois ennemis de la liberté religieuse

    Le Japon apparaît comme le principal champ de bataille entre les forces qui attaquent la liberté religieuse depuis des siècles et celles qui la défendent.

  • Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text
    Japan’s Religious Donations Law. 1. An Ambiguous Text

    The Japanese Parliament has passed laws regarding as fraudulent donations motivated by “fear” and where the “free will” of the donors has allegedly been suppressed.

  • USCIRF Charges China’s Authorized Religious Bodies as Communist Party Accomplices
    USCIRF Charges China’s Authorized Religious Bodies as Communist Party Accomplices

    A new report exposes the five authorized religions’ “complicity in the government’s systematic, ongoing, and egregious violations of religious freedom.”

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY