• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • TESTIMONIES
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
  • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / International / Testimonies Global

Mary Poppins: Was She a “Cult Member,” Too?

01/15/2022Massimo Introvigne |

Christian critics of “cults” often argue that novels and films about Mary Poppins promote “cultic” or “occult” ideas. All is based on an old misunderstanding.

by Massimo Introvigne

Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins in the 1964 Disney movie.
Julie Andrews as Mary Poppins in the 1964 Disney movie. Credits.

One of the favorite topics of Christian conservative criticism of “cults” or “the occult” is that it is promoted through books and films that poison children with esoteric and even Satanic ideas. From the late 1990s on, the novels and movies featuring Mary Poppins, the flying nanny created by the Australian-British novelist Pamela Travers, are often at the receiving end of this criticism.

I am particularly interested in this story because I am afraid I contributed, unwillingly, to the creation of the Mary Poppins “cult” scare. The story in itself is not less extraordinary than Pamela Travers’ creature.

On September 6, 1995, La Stampa, Turin’s daily newspaper, titled at full page “Is Mary Poppins really Satan?” Many readers were, understandably, surprised but no reader was more astonished than me. In fact, I learned from the article that I had accused Mary Poppins to have “clear links with esoteric and Satanic ideas,” and with the world of “cults.”  I was credited for having discovered that “under the gentle mask of the extraordinary nanny a dangerous creature is hidden, with features that clearly appear as Satanic.”

The same journalist, appropriately, interviewed a Catholic exorcist who complained that “Introvigne normally minimizes the presence of Satanism in our life,” a reference to my books and articles on Satanism where I denounced ill-founded Satanism scares. But this, for the exorcist, amounted to still more convincing evidence that Mary Poppins was really promoting Satanic “cults”: “If Massimo Introvigne has written such a thing, he said, this could only mean that the danger is really there.”

The problem was, however, that I had never written “such a thing.” The day before, on September 5, 1995, the Catholic daily newspaper Avvenire had published an article by me on Pamela Travers and esotericism that was, if anything, complimentary to the creator of Mary Poppins. This did not prevent other Italian daily newspapers from picking up the news that Mary Poppins was “a cultist” or “a Satanist.” The story was spicy enough that Italian media were quoted abroad, reinforcing an association between Mary Poppins and “cults” that persists to this day.

I wrote a letter to La Stampa, and slowly persuaded most Italian reporters that there was in fact a big misunderstanding. By September 8, the situation was improving, and another daily newspaper, Il Manifesto, wrote, appropriately, that the news was not that I had accused Mary Poppins of “cultism” or Satanism, but that a reputable newspaper like La Stampa had entirely misrepresented my Avvenire article.

Calling my article in Avvenire “original, entertaining and scholarly,” Il Manifesto commented that “Introvigne simply analyzed the cultural education of Pamela Travers” and “called for more scholarly studies about the important cultural influence of [Russian-Armenian esoteric teacher George Ivanovich] Gurdjieff in Europe.” The newspaper correctly noted that the word “esotericism” that I used for the work of Pamela Travers is not a synonym of “occultism” and much less of “Satanism,” and I never used the word “cult.”

What was this all about? In 1995, I was in contact with Pamela Travers, who was 95 and will die the following year. In the end, I received some letters she dictated to her doctor, as she was no longer fit enough to write or talk herself. My interest was to hear from Travers how she met Gurdjieff and how her relationship with him developed.

Pamela Travers as a young woman.
Pamela Travers as a young woman. Credits.

As she confirmed to me, the novelist and the esoteric master met in 1938, while the first edition of Mary Poppins was published in 1934. The equally famous Mary Poppins Comes Back followed in 1935. These novels, thus, could not have been influenced by Travers’ meetings with Gurdjieff.

However, Travers admitted that some allusions to Gurdjieff, who by then had become an important reference for her, were included in subsequent Mary Poppins books, particularly Mary Poppins Opens the Door in 1944 and Mary Poppins in the Park in 1952. Travers more clearly alluded to Gurdjieff in her non-fiction works About the Sleeping Beauty (1975) and What the Bee Knows (1989), and in her non-Mary Poppins fictional work Friend Monkey (1971). Travers also wrote the entry on Gurdjieff for Richard Cavendish’ encyclopedia Man, Myth & Magic (1970), on which she based the subsequent booklet George Ivanovitch Gurdjieff (1973), which had a limited distribution.

Cover of Travers’ 1973 booklet on Gurdjieff.
Cover of Travers’ 1973 booklet on Gurdjieff.

One example of Travers’ allusions to Gurdjieff in Mary Poppins in the Park is when the children entrusted to the care of the nanny, Jane and Michael, discover that the distinction between our tangible “real” world and other worlds is less clear-cut than it seems. While Jane is reading to Michael in the Park the story of three princes, called Florimond, Veritain, and Amor, the princes step out from the book and start a real-life conversation with the children.

Michael tells the princes that he and his sister are “real” while Florimond and his colleagues are just characters from a book. Florimond invites Michael to touch his quite solid dagger, and admonishes the boy not to be so sure about what is real and what is not.

Of course, there can be many sources other than Gurdjieff for the idea that the distinction between the real and the imaginary world is not as obvious as it may seem. However, Travers herself stated that allusions to Gurdjieff are disseminated into her post-1938 books, and that they are “Zen parables” that one can read at various different levels.

Christian critics of “cults,” just like the author of La Stampa 1995 article, have built a syllogism: Gurdjieff was a Satanic “cultist,” the author of Mary Poppins was a disciple of Gurdjieff; thus, Mary Poppins’ stories and film promote “cults” and Satanism, and children should be protected from them.

A first answer to this is that Disney’s Mary Poppins movies do not include any of the references to Gurdjieff and his ideas one may find in the later Travers novels. These allusions are subtle, can be understood only by those who know Gurdjieff, and the Disney screenwriters did not take from the novels their more philosophical comments, not fit for movies primarily intended for children. This was one of the reasons Travers repeatedly commented that the 1964 acclaimed Disney film Mary Poppins was a good movie but one that had little to do with her books.

More importantly, Gurdjieff was not a Satanist. Some Christian counter-cultists have been misled by the title of his posthumous book, Beelzebub’s Tales to His Grandson, but Gurdjieff’s complicated esoteric system, which is based on Eastern Orthodox Christianity, Sufism, and various brands of Western esotericism, is totally different from Satanism.

Yes, Travers had esoteric interests and regarded herself as a disciple of Gurdjieff. There are some subtle traces of this, not easy to detect for the non-specialist, in her later Mary Poppins novels—but not in the earlier ones, which are the most famous and the ones that inspired the 1964 Disney movie. Certainly this film, a masterpiece that won five Academy Awards, does not promote any “cult,” and associating it with Satanism is simply ridiculous. The same is true for Travers’ Mary Poppins novels. While her esoteric ideas may be detected by scholars in some passages, and in some of the songs she liked to include in the novels, her fiction was certainly not intended to promote them.

Tagged With: Anti-Cult

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • MIVILUDES’ rapport van 2022: van slordig tot lasterlijk

    MIVILUDES’ rapport van 2022: van slordig tot lasterlijk

  • Novopashin confirme : « Les anti-sectes russes font toujours partie de la FECRIS »

    Novopashin confirme : « Les anti-sectes russes font toujours partie de la FECRIS »

  • Novopashin Confirms: “Russian Anti-Cultists Are Still Part of FECRIS”

    Novopashin Confirms: “Russian Anti-Cultists Are Still Part of FECRIS”

  • France: Is State Secretary Sonia Backès a “Scientology Survivor“? Her Brother Tells a Different Story

    France: Is State Secretary Sonia Backès a “Scientology Survivor“? Her Brother Tells a Different Story

Keep Reading

  • « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».
    « Église de Philadelphie » : Comment la MIVILUDES et les mouvements antisectes français ont inventé une « secte ».

    En 2011, la femme et les quatre enfants d’un aristocrate français ont été assassinés. Les militants antisectes ont tenté de relier ce crime aux « sectes ». Leur action en justice vient de s’effondrer.

  • Un hiver amer (Bitter Winter) pour la MIVILUDES
    Un hiver amer (Bitter Winter) pour la MIVILUDES

    La crise profonde de la mission gouvernementale française de lutte contre les sectes a été révélée par la démission de sa cheffe, Hanène Romdhane.

  • Spanish Supreme Court: Political Parties Cannot Exclude “Cult” Devotees as Candidates
    Spanish Supreme Court: Political Parties Cannot Exclude “Cult” Devotees as Candidates

    The judges sanctioned the Podemos party for its discrimination of members based on the sole reason that they belonged to the Prometheus Initiatory School.

  • Russian Anti-Cult Leader: “The US and Ukraine Use Satanists to Destroy the Whole Orthodox World”
    Russian Anti-Cult Leader: “The US and Ukraine Use Satanists to Destroy the Whole Orthodox World”

    “The whole of Ukraine has become a horror movie,” where Satanists are trained to unleash the Apocalypse, Alexander Novopashin said in a new propaganda interview.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Pro-Chinese Propaganda by The World Muslim Communities Council: Uyghurs Strike Back by Gulfiye Y
  • Zhanargul Zhumatai: “Help Me, I Just Want to Leave China” by Ruth Ingram
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind by Massimo Introvigne
  • Stricter Rules on Private Tutoring Protect Ideology Rather than Parents by Wang Zhipeng
  • Japan Religious Donations Law. 4. The Return of Brainwashing by Massimo Introvigne
  • Hong Kong: Christian Scholar Peng Manyuan Released but Not Rehabilitated by Gladys Kwok
  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet by Marco Respinti
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 4. Art and Illustration by Massimo Introvigne
  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

Instant Exclusive News
Instant Exclusive News

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

Follow us

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY