• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / News Global

Jehovah’s Witnesses and Conscientious Objection: The ECHR Condemns Lithuania

06/15/2022Massimo Introvigne |

The European Court found that the Vilnius government failed to offer to objectors a clear alternative to military service.

by Massimo Introvigne

A view of the Branch Office of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Kaunas, Lithuania. From Twitter.
A view of the Branch Office of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, Kaunas, Lithuania. From Twitter.

On June 7, 2022, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled in “Teliatnikov v. Lithuania” on a case concerning Jehovah’s Witnesses and conscientious objection. Jehovah’s Witnesses maintain that for Biblical reasons they cannot serve in the military, nor in civil institutions operated by the military administration. Indeed, in many countries of the world Jehovah’s Witnesses had a pioneer role leading to laws allowing for conscientious objection.

The case decided by the ECHR was particularly complicated, in part because of intervening changes in the Lithuanian situation as a consequence of a 2017 decision by the Lithuanian Constitutional Court.

The applicant, one of Jehovah’s Witness named Stanislav Teliatnikov, was conscripted for military service in 2015. He refused for conscientious and Biblical reasons, asking to be allowed to perform civilian service instead. His request was refused, and the refusal was upheld by the Ministry of Defense. He then started court proceedings, claiming that he was entitled to an exemption as a minister of religion of Jehovah’s Witnesses.

At that time, Lithuanian law granted exemptions to religious ministers, but only if they belonged to one of nine “traditional religions” recognized as such, among which the Jehovah’s Witnesses were not included. Teliatnikov claimed that this provision was discriminatory, and in other cases it had already been submitted to the Lithuanian Constitutional Court, which should examine its constitutionality.

The Vilnius Regional Administrative Court suspended the Teliatnikov trial pending the decision of the Constitutional Court. The latter ruled on July 4, 2017, that the exemption granted to the ministers of the nine “traditional religions” was unconstitutional. Rather than extending it to ministers of all religions, however, the Constitutional Court judges abolished the provision altogether, claiming there can be no exceptions to the duty to serve in the military or to perform “alternative national defense service,” which is managed by the military authorities.

After the Constitutional Court’s decision, the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court resumed the trial and, on September 30, 2017, found partially in favor of Teliatnikov and asked the military authorities to reconsider whether he should be allowed to perform alternative civilian service. Rather than complying, the Ministry of Defense appealed to the Supreme Administrative Court, which on April 10, 2019, found in favor of the military authorities and stated that there was no ground to exempt Teliatnikov from his duty to perform military service or alternative national defense service.

Meanwhile, Teliatnikov had been informed that he would not be called for military service because the recruitment quota had been filled by volunteers. The ECHR stated that this did not make his application inadmissible. There were still both actual and potential consequences arising from the fact that Teliatnikov’s right to conscientious objection had not been recognized.

The ECHR observed that the discrimination against ministers of religious communities not part of the “nine traditional religions” has been eliminated by the Lithuanian Constitutional Court, but with results that are somewhat paradoxical. In fact, “although the distinction between ministers of traditional and non-traditional religious organizations and associations has been declared unconstitutional…, the outcome of the Constitutional Court’s finding is the opposite result to that argued for by the applicant. Namely, rather than releasing ministers of all religious denominations, such as the applicant, from the obligation to perform military service, the Constitutional Court ruled that no ministers, irrespective of religious organization or association, can be exempted from the obligation to perform military service.”

The ECHR mentioned the two principles its case law has established on the question of conscientious objection to military service. First, while serving in the military cannot be refused for reasons of mere preference or economic interest, “genuinely held” philosophical or religious beliefs should be respected. Second, the states have the right to impose to conscientious objectors an alternative service, but it should be a “genuine civilian service.”

In the case of Lithuania, the ECHR acknowledged that the country does offer an alternative to active military duty, after having examined whether conscientious objection stems from sincerely held beliefs. However, the Court found that the Lithuanian “alternative national defense service” is not “genuinely civilian.” The Court “acknowledges the fact that the work performed by alternative national defense service workers is of a civilian nature; yet, this is of no consequence.”

This work, in fact, is performed “directly under the supervision and control of the military” and has six features that identify it as inherently military. First, those “performing alternative national defense service are referred to as ‘military conscripts’ and/or ‘military draftees’” in Lithuanian laws and regulations. Second, “the type of work to be performed is assigned by the military.” Third, if no civilian work assignment is available, the law mandates that “the military conscript will be assigned to perform alternative service in the national defense system institutions.” Fourth, the “military conscript” will be “taken to his assigned place of work by the military and given the same ‘provisions (except for living quarters and clothing)’ as ‘military service soldiers.’” Fifth, according to the relevant regulations, “the manager of the institution where the ‘military conscript’ performs his work immediately notifies the military in writing about ‘the [military conscript’s] appointment, specific tasks, conditions and work time,’ and provides the military with a monthly ‘time roster’ for the military conscript.’” Sixth, a “military conscript” performing alternative national defense service “‘cannot be dismissed’ for disciplinary violations by the manager of the institution where he is working, without the approval of the military.”

The ECHR also observed that “under Article 26 of the Law on Conscription, in the event of mobilization, the ‘military conscript’ performing ‘alternative national defense service’ may be ‘summoned to perform military service.’” The Court concluded that the Lithuanian “alternative national defense service is intrinsically linked to military service, and therefore cannot be seen as separate civilian service,” adding that “in 2018 the same position was taken by the United Nations Human Rights Committee, in a report concerning the human rights situation in Lithuania.”

The ECHR concluded that “the system in Lithuania failed to strike a fair balance between the interests of society and those of the applicant who has deeply and genuinely held beliefs. Accordingly, the refusal by the State to respect the applicant’s conscientious objection to military service was not necessary in a democratic society.” Until it will offer a genuine civilian alternative to military service, which the current alternative national defense service is not, Lithuania will not have respected the principles established by the ECHR on religion-based conscientious objection as part of religious liberty.

Tagged With: Jehovah’s Witnesses, Lithuania

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Norway: Why the European Court of Human Rights Rejected a Complaint from a Disfellowshipped Former Jehovah’s Witness

    Norway: Why the European Court of Human Rights Rejected a Complaint from a Disfellowshipped Former Jehovah’s Witness

  • 「MIVILUDES」2022年度報告書: ずさんさから誹謗中傷へ

    「MIVILUDES」2022年度報告書: ずさんさから誹謗中傷へ

  • Jehovas Zeugen: Vorwürfe des sexuellen Missbrauchs in Deutschland als haltlos entlarvt

    Jehovas Zeugen: Vorwürfe des sexuellen Missbrauchs in Deutschland als haltlos entlarvt

  • Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 2. Odłączenie się i wykluczenie

    Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 2. Odłączenie się i wykluczenie

Keep Reading

  • Gentse uitspraak in hoger beroep vernietigd: Jehovah’s Getuigen mogen het beleid om te mijden vrijelijk onderwijzen en toepassen in België
    Gentse uitspraak in hoger beroep vernietigd: Jehovah’s Getuigen mogen het beleid om te mijden vrijelijk onderwijzen en toepassen in België

    Het Gentse Hof van Beroep bekritiseert het vonnis in eerste aanleg en beslist dat het mijdingsbeleid wordt beschermd door de principes van godsdienstvrijheid.

  • Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 5. Czy unikanie kontaktów jest „niezgodne z prawem”?
    Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów. 5. Czy unikanie kontaktów jest „niezgodne z prawem”?

    Sądy powszechne na całym świecie dochodzą do wniosku, że nauczanie o unikaniu kontaktów i praktykowanie tego zwyczaju jest chronione prawem do wolności religijnej. I mają rację.

  • Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów 1. Dlaczego praktykują unikanie kontaktów
    Świadkowie Jehowy a unikanie kontaktów 1. Dlaczego praktykują unikanie kontaktów

    Unikanie kontaktów z wykluczonymi byłymi członkami wyznania to typowa praktyka religii monoteistycznych. Uczeni podają argumenty uzasadniające jej stosowanie

  • Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses
    Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses

    As it was easy to predict, anti-cultists shamelessly exploited even the March 9 massacre in Germany to attack the Jehovah’s Witnesses.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses by Massimo Introvigne
  • The Donnie Yen Fiasco: A Uyghur View by Rebiya Kadeer
  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • The “Buddhist and Taoist Clergy Database,” Another CCP Imposture by He Yuyan
  • The Suicide of the Pink-Haired Girl: How the CCP Exploited a Tragedy by Zhou Kexin
  • Second-Generation Unification Church Believers Discriminated in Japan. 3. Media Slander Leads to Discrimination by Masumi Fukuda
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY