• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Featured Global

Russian Anti-Cult Leader: “International Religious Liberty Is a Nazi Idea”

10/24/2022Massimo Introvigne |

Archpriest Alexander Novopashin explains that international freedom of religion “as it is understood in America” is a theory created by Adolf Hitler to destroy Russia.

by Massimo Introvigne 

Novopashin at the Alexander-Svirsky Monastery, Lodeynoye Pole, during his lecture tour in Leningrad Oblast. From Telegram.
Novopashin at the Alexander-Svirsky Monastery, Lodeynoye Pole, during his lecture tour in Leningrad Oblast. From Telegram.

Almost every day, a new argument is advanced by the Russian anti-cult organizations to support the aggression against Ukraine and slander the Ukrainian government, the United States, and the West in general. Readers of Bitter Winter should by now be familiar with Archpriest Alexander Novopashin, the deputy of famous Russian anti-cultist Alexander Dvorkin as leader of the  national anti-cult umbrella organization Russian Association of Centers for Religious and Cultic Studies (РАЦИРС/RATsIRS), which is connected with the European anti-cult federation FECRIS (despite unconfirmed theories that RATsIRS has been expelled from FECRIS, Novopashin’ s website still mentions it is FECRIS’ Russian affiliate).

Last week, “with the blessing of His Eminence Nikodim, Metropolitan of Novosibirsk and Berdsk and at the invitation of Bishop Mstislav of Tikhvin and Lodeynopolsk,” Novopashin “met with teachers, security officials, administration officials, Orthodox clergy and leaders of youth organizations, commissions for minors and their protection, departments for youth policy, culture and sports, public organizations of the cities of Tikhvin, Lodeynoye Pole, Vsevolozhsk, Podporozhye, Pikalevo, Boksitogorsk, Issad village, Volkhov district,” in what is still called the Leningrad Oblast (although its main city, Leningrad, went back to its old name of St. Petersburg in 1991).

Novopashin reiterated that “Nazism and Satanism are one and the same” and that the fight for the “denazification and demilitarization of Ukraine” is a fight against Satanism.

This is vintage Novopashin, and would not deserve further attention, had not the FECRIS archpriest also presented a bizarre theory connecting religious liberty with Adolf Hitler. 

Novopashin explained that when Russia cracks down on “cults” such as “the Jehovah’s Witnesses,” “the US State Department immediately intervenes and begins to demand the respect of religious freedom in the way it is understood in America. And in the United States, they believe that international religious freedom is the most important factor in the internal security of the United States, as President Obama openly declared in 2008. Therefore, limiting the activities of destructive cults and radical groups in Russia is detrimental to US national security. And no matter what cult, no matter what its origin, the main thing is that it destabilizes the situation [of Russia] and introduces division, and therefore it is suitable for carrying out foreign policy tasks.”

This modern “American” notion of international religious freedom, Novopashin claims, was actually invented by Adolf Hitler. To prove this theory, which perhaps raises eyebrows even among his Russian audiences, the archpriest quotes a Russian edition, published in Smolensk in 1998, of Hitler’s “Tischgespräche” (Table Talks) edited by the Führer’s one-time stenographer, attorney Henry Picker.

The text is a collection of notes, taken by different Nazi officers, of private conversations with Hitler between 1941 and 1944. After World War II, it went under different editions, and was always controversial among historians. Particularly, Hitler’s alleged remarks about religion are regarded as apocryphal by several leading scholars of Nazism, and perhaps reflecting more the ideas of Picker and others who edited the manuscripts.

Henry Picker and the 1976 edition of his book.
Henry Picker (credits) and the 1976 edition of his book.

Translators have also been often accused of mistranslating the German original, to which one should always revert—and even the authenticity of this text, in the sense of reporting Hitler’s real words in private conversations, is dubious. I have not seen the Russian translation quoted by Novopashin, and have no reasons to doubt he quotes it correctly.

Hitler would have said, speaking of Russia, that “It is in our interests that each village should have its own sect, developing its own idea of God. Even if in this way a cult of sorcerers arises in individual villages, as, say, among the Negroes or Indians, we should only welcome this, because this will increase the number of destructive moments on Russian territory. Every nation needs a religion or an ideology. Preserving and supporting the Orthodox Church is unreasonable, since it will again turn into an organization of national unity.”

This is not what Hitler allegedly said according to the German edition of the “Tischgespräche.” There, we read at page 215 of the 1976 edition (Seewald, Stuttgart), generally regarded as the most reliable, that according to words attributed to Hitler after the German conquest of Russia “the creation of unified churches for large parts of the Russian territory should be prevented. It could even be in our interest if each village had its own sect, which develops its own ideas of God. Even if in this way magic cults were to form in individual villages, as among the Negroes and Indians, we could only welcome this, because it would only increase the number of divisive moments in the Russian area. Hitler noted with particular annoyance that the Russian Orthodox Church unitedly and emphatically stood up for the defense of the ‘Holy Russian Fatherland,’ spurred on the spirit of resistance everywhere at the front and at home, immediately deposed and excommunicated the few bishops who collaborated with Germany, and even gave the atheistic Soviet leadership a tank brigade (‘Alexander Nevsky’) from church funds. Hitler, though, would have liked to have in his own Germany a ‘national church’ in the style of the Russian-Orthodox one.”

Picker (left) and Hitler during World War II. From Telegram.
Picker (left) and Hitler during World War II. From Telegram.

Novopashin obviously uses the quote in 2022 within a broader context of Russian propaganda, mostly created for the benefits of Russians themselves, which tries to present the war on the Ukrainian “Nazis” as a remake of the Patriotic War against Hitler. However, how Hitler’s alleged words are used adds a further manipulation. Assuming he really said something similar, Hitler was not interested in the “destructive” role of “cults,” and certainly was not referring to theories similar to the Dvorkin-Novopashin-FECRIS ideology of “destructive cults.”

What he would welcome in a conquered Russia would be a religion that would be “divisive” (“trennende,” which is wrongly translated as “разрушающих,” “destructive”), countering the nationalistic role of the Russian Orthodox Church demonstrated by the attitude of the Moscow Patriarchate during the war.

In a way, Hitler admired this attitude. He was “annoyed” when he had to confront it in Russia, where it created problems for Germany, but would gladly have in Germany a “national church” loyal to the state similar to the Russian Orthodox Church. On the other hand, Hitler should have realized that the national organization of the Russian Orthodox Church had already been largely disarticulated by Stalin himself, before the short-lived attempt to resurrect it and put it at the service of the war against Germany. 

The reference to the “magic cults” that may arise in Russian villages, again if the text is genuine, would confirm Hitler’s low and racist opinion of Russian peasants, regarded as similar to Africans and Native Americans (for him, obviously this was not a compliment). But it has nothing to do with organizing “cults” such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses or the Church of Scientology (which are not the “village cults” somebody like Hitler might have found described in the works of German anthropologists) and implanting them in Russia in the name of religious liberty.

Novopashin during his lecture against religious liberty tour in the Leningrad Oblast. From Telegram.
Novopashin during his lecture tour in the Leningrad Oblast. From Telegram.

No, Hitler did not invent the contemporary American notion of international religious liberty. American theories of religious liberty date back to the 18th century and Hitler certainly did not agree with them. Rather than promoting the Jehovah’s Witnesses, he sent them to concentration camps, where more than 1,000 of them died. 

What the “Tischgespräche” attribute to Hitler is the idea that most Russian Orthodox Church leaders would support the Russian authorities and wars, no matter who would be in power and even if he was a cynical and bloody dictator such as Stalin. Or Putin, we may add. While today the importance of the Russian Orthodox Church’s support for the Russian victory in the Patriotic War is often exaggerated for propaganda purposes, at least on the Patriarchate’s readiness to side with dictators in the name of Russian nationalism, Hitler, or whoever wrote the words attributed to him in the “Tischgespräche,” was right.  

Tagged With: Anti-Cult, Religious Liberty, Russia

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Odesa Transfiguration Cathedral. 1. After the Russian Bombing, Help Is Needed for Reconstruction

    Odesa Transfiguration Cathedral. 1. After the Russian Bombing, Help Is Needed for Reconstruction

  • Argentina: El gobierno promueve la teoría pseudocientífica del lavado de cerebro

    Argentina: El gobierno promueve la teoría pseudocientífica del lavado de cerebro

  • With A Little Help from My Friends: Russian Anti-Cultist Supports China Atrocities

    With A Little Help from My Friends: Russian Anti-Cultist Supports China Atrocities

  • Chinese Performer Offends Ukraine by Singing in the Destroyed Mariupol Drama Theatre

    Chinese Performer Offends Ukraine by Singing in the Destroyed Mariupol Drama Theatre

Keep Reading

  • Denuncian abusos de derechos humanos contra la Escuela de Yoga de Buenos Aires en las Naciones Unidas
    Denuncian abusos de derechos humanos contra la Escuela de Yoga de Buenos Aires en las Naciones Unidas

    Exposición escrita presentada por Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience, organización no gubernamental reconocida como entidad consultiva especial

  • Misusing Anti-Trafficking Laws Against Spiritual Minorities: The Case of PROTEX in Argentina
    Misusing Anti-Trafficking Laws Against Spiritual Minorities: The Case of PROTEX in Argentina

    A statement by “Bitter Winter” editor at a closed-door session on freedom of religion or belief of the 2023 Parliament of the World’s Religions in Chicago.

  • An American Scholar Looks at Scientology in France—and at the Sonia Backès Saga
    An American Scholar Looks at Scientology in France—and at the Sonia Backès Saga

    A scholarly article notes how in France “political power can be weaponized against minority religions with the backing of the state.”

  • Russia Claims that Ukrainian Counter-Offensive Uses “Gay Super-Soldiers” Created by “Cults”
    Russia Claims that Ukrainian Counter-Offensive Uses “Gay Super-Soldiers” Created by “Cults”

    Academic Sergei Markov absurdly claimed on prime-time state TV that Ukraine cooperates with Neuro-Linguistic Programming to brainwash soldiers who become homosexual, zombie-like, and invincible.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

MOST READ

  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 1. A General Outline by Tatsuki Nakayama
  • Gansu: World-Famous Xiguan Mosque Is Also “Sinicized” by Ma Wenyan
  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 2. Dissolving Would Be Contrary to the Law by Tatsuki Nakayama
  • China’s Strange Battle Against Buddhists Releasing Mineral Water into Rivers by Gladys Kwok
  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 3. The Truth About “Spiritual Sales” and “Excessive Donations” by Tatsuki Nakayama
  • China Promotes a “Confucianized” Approach to the Holy Quran by Ma Wenyan
  • Can Religious Liberty Bring Taiwan to Build an Alternative International Diplomacy? by Marco Respinti

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY