• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Featured Global

L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 3. Art as Communication

01/25/2023Massimo Introvigne |

The founder of Scientology believed that, if the technique endangers the transmission of the message, the artist should change the technique rather than the message.

by Massimo Introvigne

Article 3 of 8. Read article 1 and article 2.

The founder of Scientology, Ron Hubbard in 1965. Source: lronhubbard.org.
Hubbard in 1965. Source: lronhubbard.org.

On 30 August 1965, Hubbard issued a technical bulletin that was crucially important for his theory of art. He took again as his starting point that “art is the least codified of human endeavors and the most misunderstood.” The question about art “is one of the least answered of human questions.” He also reiterated the general principle of Dianetics according to which “that field containing the most authorities contains the least codified knowledge.” Since “art abounds with authorities,” obviously very little real knowledge exists.

Hubbard explained that it was now fifteen years that it had started considering how to “codify” the knowledge about art and discussing this theme with Donald H. Rogers, one of the members of Dianetics’ original circle, in Elizabeth, New Jersey. He announced that “this [the ‘codification’ of aesthetic theory] has now been done.”

At first, art “seemed to stand outside the field of Dianetics and Scientology.” Hubbard, however, was not persuaded by this conclusion and eventually “made a breakthrough.” He realized that art and communication are closely connected. In fact, “ART is a word which summarizes THE QUALITY OF COMMUNICATION” (capitals in the original). Scientology had already elaborated certain “laws” about communication. Now, they should be applied to the arts.

In 1965, Hubbard was ready to propose three axioms. The first was that “too much originality throws the audience into unfamiliarity and therefore disagreement.” Communication, in fact, includes “duplication.” If the audience is totally unable to replicate the experience, it would not understand nor appreciate the work of art. The second axiom taught that “TECHNIQUE should not rise above the level of workability for the purpose of communication.” The third maintained that “PERFECTION cannot be attained at the expense of communication” (capitals in the original).

Hubbard believed that his approach to aesthetics was new with respect to both classic and contemporary theories of art. The latter emphasize “originality,” to the point that audiences are often surprised but, Hubbard maintained, not persuaded. The former sought perfection through technique. But, according to Hubbard, “seeking perfection is a wrong target in art.” The right target is communication. “One should primarily seek communication with it [art] and then perfect it as far as reasonable.”

Too much perfection transports the artist into a realm inaccessible to the audience. “If perfection greater than that which can be attained for communication is sought, one will not communicate.” This does not mean that technical perfection is unimportant. The artist should seek the highest level of technical perfection compatible with effective communication. “Perfection is defined as the quality obtainable which still permits the delivery of the communication.” Often, the artist should be prepared to lower the level of perfection to allow communication to flow.

The posthumous book “Art” (1991) collected Hubbard’s writings on aesthetics.
The posthumous book “Art” (1991) collected Hubbard’s writings on aesthetics.

The same applies to technique. In the realm of art, communication is the first aim and a good technical rendition of the message is the second. But this second aim, Hubbard believes, is always subordinate to the first. Technique should be as perfect as possible, but never so perfect as to compromise communication. “The communication is the primary target. The technical quality of it is the secondary consideration.” If the technique endangers the transmission of the message, the artist should change the technique rather than the message.

It is, of course, also true that below a certain level of technique there is no art. But this, Hubbard insists, is precisely the difference between a professional artist and an amateur, a distinction he will return to in later years: “A professional in the arts is one who obtains communication with the art form at the minimum sacrifice of technical quality (…). No communication is no art. To not do the communication for lack of technical perfection is the primary error. It is also an error not to push up the technical aspects of the result as high as possible.”

“Art for art’s sake,” Hubbard argues, always failed because it was “attempted perfection without communicating.” We become artists when we learn how to communicate. Except in very rare cases, this does not come naturally, nor is achieved overnight. Normally, one becomes an artist gradually, reflecting on past failures to communicate. These are, in fact, engrams, and artists should be “rehabilitated” through Dianetics just as anybody else, yet considering that they have specific engrams of their own. In fact, “due to the nature of the Reactive Mind, full rehabilitation [of the artists] is achieved only through releasing and clearing.”

Michelangelo (1475–1564) offered a perfect example of art capable of communicating to all audiences. Credits.
Michelangelo (1475–1564) offered a perfect example of art capable of communicating to all audiences. Credits.

It is not enough to communicate to ourselves. Artists should learn how to communicate to a wider audience: “A concept of the beholder and some understanding of his or her acceptance level is necessary to the formulation of a successful art form or presentation.” To determine how this result can be achieved, Hubbard returns to the premise that communication is based on familiarity. The beholder receives and understands the message if it is not too far away from what he or she regards as familiar. “All Art depends for its success upon the former experience and associations of the beholder.”

 Since beholders vary, there are no general rules. However, an artist should not easily conclude that communication fails because the audience is primitive, or its taste is not educated enough, or the message is too advanced and revolutionary. More often, the poor relationship with an audience is not caused by the audience itself, but by the artist’s own engrams, based on previous failures. These engrams should be taken care of. “Scientology then is a must for any artist if he would succeed without heartbreak.”

There are artists exhibiting “a lack of desire to communicate.” This is how, Hubbard explains, old schools or forms of art decline and disappear. Some believe that they decline because, within a school or style, the artists of a later generation simply imitate those of the former and lack their masters’ technical skills and genius. But the real problem is about communication, not “technology.” Old forms decline because they become obsessed with technique and forget that the aim of art is communication. “All old forms become beset by technical musts and must nots and so cease to communicate.”

There is also a “primary suppression,” when a work of art is physically damaged or destroyed. On the other hand, “failing continuously to permit a non- destructive communication on the grounds of its lack of art is also suppressive.” In-between these different forms of suppression, according to Hubbard, lies art. Genuine art is the capacity to create works with the best technique and the maximum degree of perfection that are possible without harming communication.

Tagged With: Church of Scientology, Religion and arts

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 8. Una spiritualità dell’arte

    Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 8. Una spiritualità dell’arte

  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs

    L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 5. Professionals vs. Amateurs

  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 6. Montage, Color, Integration

    L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 6. Montage, Color, Integration

  • Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 2. Il mito dell’artista depravato

    Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 2. Il mito dell’artista depravato

Keep Reading

  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 2. The Myth of the Loose-Moraled Artist
    L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 2. The Myth of the Loose-Moraled Artist

    For a certain culture, being a good artist came to be “commonly identified with being loose-moraled, wicked, idle, and drunken.” That culture, Hubbard believed, was wrong.

  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind
    L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 1. The Aesthetic Mind

    The founder of Scientology devoted much attention to aesthetics. However, his texts on the subject remain little-known.

  • L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 7. The Scientologist as Artist
    L. Ron Hubbard, Scientology, and the Visual Arts. 7. The Scientologist as Artist

    Through its Celebrity Centres, Scientology systematically interacts with the artists, be they superstars or “commercial” painters.

  • Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 5. Dilettanti e professionisti
    Hubbard, Scientology e le arti figurative. 5. Dilettanti e professionisti

    L’artista professionista è chi sa usare adeguatamente la “scena ideale” e la “collezione di ricordi”, due concetti tipici di Hubbard.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Blaming the Victims: The Hamburg Shooting and the Jehovah’s Witnesses by Massimo Introvigne
  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • The Suicide of the Pink-Haired Girl: How the CCP Exploited a Tragedy by Zhou Kexin
  • Censorship Frenzy: Do Not Search for “2952” in China or You Will Get Into Trouble  by Tan Liwei
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne
  • Empowering the Next Generation of Uyghurs to Challenge China’s Genocide by Marco Respinti
  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media” by Zhou Kexin

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY