• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / China / Featured China

“Xinjiang and Tibet, Parallel Genocides”—Or Perhaps Not?

06/25/2021Massimo Introvigne |

An interesting controversy between Tibetologist Robert Barnett and Tibetan (and international) human rights activists.

by Massimo Introvigne

The connecting link? Chen Quanguo went from Tibet to Xinjiang as CCP Secretary. Source: Free Tibet.
The connecting link? Chen Quanguo went from Tibet to Xinjiang as CCP Secretary. Source: Free Tibet.

Professor Robert Barnett of the London’s School of Oriental and African Studies and King’s College is one of the most eminent living Tibetologists (we know from correspondence with him that he also reads Bitter Winter). He published in the “Asia Unbound” blog of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR) a provocative article where he criticized those who claim that Tibetans are experiencing “similar abuses” to those vested on the Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim populations in Xinjiang. He mentioned in particular claims advanced by German researcher Adrian Zenz and by politicians and scholars connected with the Tibetan administration in exile, supported by some Western colleagues. Some Tibetan activists took exception to Barnett’s article, and one asked the CFR to publish his rebuttal.

The controversy has been discussed in several international media, and deserves some comments. First, it is important to clarify what Barnett did not say. He did not argue that Adrian Zenz is a partisan or unreliable researcher. On the contrary, Barnett wrote that Zenz “has done well-regarded work on Tibet and Xinjiang in the past. His more recent work has been attacked and abused by Chinese state media and others, including smears about his religious beliefs by a pro-Chinese denialist called Max Blumenthal, demonstrating a particularly ugly form of hypocrisy.”

Barnett did not argue that Tibetans are not abused by the CCP either. He stated that “Chinese policies in Tibet are exceptionally restrictive and repressive,” that “camps were created to hold Tibetans detained without being accused of any crime,” and that “serious abuse,” including “sexual harassment,” happened in “camps created in 2017 to house monks and nuns expelled from a number of monasteries in eastern Tibetan areas, notably Larung Gar.” Other “camps were created temporarily in hotels, schools, or converted army bases to hold Tibetans for purposes such as ‘legal education.’” Barnett also acknowledges the significance of the fact that the current CCP Secretary of Xinjiang formerly held the same position in Tibet.

Where, thus, is the disagreement? Barnett claims that, whatever the horror of the abuses vested on Tibetan nuns, monks, and laypersons, there is such a difference in “scale and degree” with what is happening in Xinjiang that equating the two situations is incorrect. Barnett believes that 6,000 to 7,000 Tibetans have been detained in re-education camps, compared to at least one million Uyghurs and other Muslims in Xinjiang, and that atrocities, while not absent, have been much less widespread than in Xinjiang. Many have been arrested in Tibet for “separatism,” Barnett argues, but only a handful have been executed, while executions in Xinjiang are in the thousands. Barnett also discusses Zenz’s studies about forced labor in Tibet, claiming that, unlike in the same scholar’s valuable research on Xinjiang, much there is speculative. It is possible that the number of Tibetans relocated for labor has been exaggerated by CCP bureaucrats for their own purposes, Barnett says, and to what degree coercion or violence was involved is also unclear.

Barnett’s most controversial claim is that there is no effort at eradicating Tibetan culture, more at controlling, “sinicizing,” and containing it, as proved by the fact that some sectors of this culture flourish, and there is no shortage of publication of religious texts, again a very different situation from Xinjiang.

Barnett argues that the difference between Xinjiang and Tibet has deep cultural roots, pre-dating Communism. Tibetan Buddhism is seen as part of the “Three Teachings” (Confucianism, Taoism, and Buddhism), certainly with peculiarities to be kept under control, but not “foreign” to the Chinese tradition as the Islam prevailing in Xinjiang is supposed to be. Within the CCP there is also a tradition of “gradualism” in “sinicizing” Tibetan culture and society, although this school of thought has not always prevailed, while Islam has been perceived as a “threat,” and Uyghur activism labeled as “terrorism,” particularly after 9/11 (and with an initial acquiescence by the West).

Barnett’s opponents have countered that Tibetan labor is mobilized through “coercion,” even if not through “violence,” and that, no matter how many religious books are printed in Tibet, the first tool of cultural genocide is eradicating a language, and this is what is being gradually done by the CCP with respect to Tibetan. (Indeed, Barnett himself is surprised by the recent parallel attack against Mongolian language in Inner Mongolia, which contradicts a similar CCP tradition of “gradualism” in assimilating Mongolians).

Blog posts are not scholarly articles, and there is always a risk that arguments are overstated. When read carefully, Barnett and his critics appear to agree on several key points. Uyghurs and other Muslims in Xinjiang are persecuted, and Tibetans in Tibet are persecuted. Barnett is probably right in claiming that the horrific numbers and features of the persecution in Xinjiang are without comparison elsewhere. This is precisely why several countries have officially declared what is happening in Xinjiang (but not in Tibet) a genocide.

Like other scholars, Barnett is disturbed by the fact that colleagues like Zenz work hand-in-hand with activist institutions that are not academic and do not use academic language or caution. I am personally interested in this debate, as I made a similar choice. I keep writing scholarly books and articles published by academic presses and journals on Chinese religion (and other subjects), but I also edit a daily magazine and participate in activist efforts defending religious liberty and human rights in China. I do respect the choices of colleagues who believe that they should confine themselves to purely academic endeavors. On the other hand, when I founded Bitter Winter in 2018, I had concluded that what the CCP was doing to all religions, not only in Xinjiang or Tibet, was so atrocious—and had so many features of a genocide—that, knowing something about it, I should speak out, rather than limiting myself to writing academic texts for a small circle of colleagues.

Tagged With: Cultural Genocide, Genocide, Muslim Uyghurs, Tibet

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • “Waiting to Be Arrested at Night”: Tahir Hamut Izgil’s New Book is a Testament to Uyghur Indomitable Spirit

    “Waiting to Be Arrested at Night”: Tahir Hamut Izgil’s New Book is a Testament to Uyghur Indomitable Spirit

  • “Xizang”: China Insists on Depriving Tibet of Its Name

    “Xizang”: China Insists on Depriving Tibet of Its Name

  • Why Did Xi Jinping Mention a “Hard-Won Stability” in Xinjiang?

    Why Did Xi Jinping Mention a “Hard-Won Stability” in Xinjiang?

  • The 1971 Genocide in Bangladesh: Still Unacknowledged, Says a New Documentary

    The 1971 Genocide in Bangladesh: Still Unacknowledged, Says a New Documentary

Keep Reading

  • Organ Harvesting from Uyghurs: Evidence Grows, the U.S. Reacts
    Organ Harvesting from Uyghurs: Evidence Grows, the U.S. Reacts

    International moves to ban Chinese organ harvesting take positive steps forward with the passing of a U.S. bill.

  • Liu Jianchao: Notorious Human Rights Violator Received with Honors in UK
    Liu Jianchao: Notorious Human Rights Violator Received with Honors in UK

    Activists protested the UK’s red carpet treatment for one of the key authors of China’s transnational repression

  • Uyghurs Protest Xi’s Visit to Xinjiang
    Uyghurs Protest Xi’s Visit to Xinjiang

    Exiles around the world were both scandalized and dismayed by Xi’s aggressive speech.

  • The Campaign for Uyghurs Workshop in Vienna: Is Pro-Uyghur Advocacy at Its Turning Point?
    The Campaign for Uyghurs Workshop in Vienna: Is Pro-Uyghur Advocacy at Its Turning Point?

    The fourth training event hosted by Rushan Abbas’s organization was a great success. “Bitter Winter” was there.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

MOST READ

  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 2. Dissolving Would Be Contrary to the Law by Tatsuki Nakayama
  • China’s Strange Battle Against Buddhists Releasing Mineral Water into Rivers by Gladys Kwok
  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 3. The Truth About “Spiritual Sales” and “Excessive Donations” by Tatsuki Nakayama
  • China Promotes a “Confucianized” Approach to the Holy Quran by Ma Wenyan
  • Anti-Religious Social Credit Targets Southern Mongolian Peasants by Zeng Liqin
  • France: Rémi Mogenet, a Victim of Anti-Cultism, Testifies by Massimo Introvigne
  • Why the Unification Church Should Not Be Dissolved. 4. The Witch Hunt Should Be Stopped by Tatsuki Nakayama

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY