• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Op-eds Global

Why the Indiana Payne-Elliott Decision Is Good for Religious Liberty

05/19/2021Massimo Introvigne |

The court sided with a Catholic high school that fired a teacher who entered into a same-sex marriage. It is about freedom of religion, not LGBT rights.

by Massimo Introvigne

Indianapolis’ Catholic Archbishop Charles C. Thompson.
Indianapolis’ Catholic Archbishop Charles C. Thompson (from Twitter).

The Payne-Elliott case in Indiana has been widely seen as one whether conservative judges supported by a Republican-controlled state and influenced by an amicus brief submitted by Trump’s Department of Justice ruled against LGBT rights and uphold discrimination.

These comments are understandable in a polarized political situation. But there is another side of the coin. What was the real message of the Indiana Supreme Court, which sent back the case to the trial court that had initially ruled that it can move forward, and of the trial court which in its order of May 7 dismissed the case?

The plaintiff, Joshua Payne-Elliott, was a teacher at Cathedral High School in Indianapolis, which is owned and operated by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Indianapolis. In 2018, he married another male teacher in an Indianapolis Jesuit Catholic high school, Brebeuf Jesuit Preparatory School. The Archbishop of Indianapolis ordered both schools to fire the teachers. Cathedral, which is directly controlled by the Archdiocese, fired Joshua Payne-Elliott in 2019. Brebeuf did not fire Payne-Elliott’s husband. When the Archbishop reacted by ordering that Brebeuf no longer identifies itself as a Catholic school, the Jesuits appealed to the Vatican, where the case is still pending. Joshua Payne-Elliott sued the Archdiocese in state court for discrimination.

Had the case not involved a same-sex marriage, the decision by the Indiana judges would have appeared as a matter of course. To protect themselves against discrimination lawsuits, religious schools in the U.S. often ask teachers to sign statements recognizing that they should upheld “in word and deed” the teachings of the religion, and acknowledging that breaching this statement will result in being dismissed. A string of decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court stated that these statements are valid and enforceable, and that teachers in religious schools fall under the so-called “ministerial exception.” A teacher in a religious school, the Supreme Court said, is essentially in the same position as a priest or pastor or rabbi, who can be fired if s/he denies essential teachings of the religion s/he is supposed to promote.

Some can sympathize with Brebeuf, who decided to keep the teacher who entered into a same-sex marriage, and perhaps Pope Francis’ Vatican will support Brebeuf. But this is precisely the point: the Brebeuf matter is being dealt with under Catholic canon law within the Catholic system, not by secular courts. When sanctioned by the Archbishop, Brebeuf did not sue him in an American court but appealed to the Vatican.

The Cathedral case is different. The principle affirmed by the Indiana judges (subject to a possible appeal) is not that discriminating against LGBT employees may be admissible, which would obviously run counter to a well-established case law. It is that religious institutions have the right to define what religious teachings they deem as essential, and fire employees who refuse to uphold these teachings, and the state has no business in interfering with this.

Whether entering into a same-sex marriage amounts to denying a teaching essential in Catholicism may be debated by theologians, but it is a matter for the higher instances of the Catholic Church to decide, not secular judges.

Had the judges decided otherwise, they would have established a dangerous precedent. A Muslim school might have been prevented from firing a teacher ostentatiously breaching the Ramadan fasting or eating pork. An orthodox Jewish school might have been prevented from firing a teacher eating non-kosher food and ridiculing Jewish dietary laws. In the end, religious schools would lose their distinctive religious character.

Maybe the Vatican, when deciding the case of Joshua Payne-Elliott’s husband, will promote some sort of settlement of these issues, which also involve lawsuits filed against the Archdiocese of Indianapolis by two female guidance counselors at another Catholic high school, Roncalli, who entered into a same-sex marriage and were fired.

In the meantime, the Indiana judges affirmed a key religious liberty principle, i.e., that religious organizations have a right to employ only personnel committed to their essential religious teachings, and to determine themselves which teachings are essential.

Tagged With: Catholics, Religious Liberty, United States of America

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Une deuxième lettre de plus de 80 universitaires ukrainiens demande au Président Macron de mettre fin au soutien français à la fédération antisectes FECRIS

    Une deuxième lettre de plus de 80 universitaires ukrainiens demande au Président Macron de mettre fin au soutien français à la fédération antisectes FECRIS

  • Iran: “Christians Are Constantly Watched as Spies”

    Iran: “Christians Are Constantly Watched as Spies”

  • 日本の宗教献金法 4. 洗脳の復活

    日本の宗教献金法 4. 洗脳の復活

  • “Religious Abuse of Children”: Another Assault Against Freedom of Religion in Japan. 1. A New Notion of “Abuse”

    “Religious Abuse of Children”: Another Assault Against Freedom of Religion in Japan. 1. A New Notion of “Abuse”

Keep Reading

  • « Maltraitance religieuse des enfants ». Une autre attaque contre la liberté religieuse au Japon. 2. « Maltraitance psychologique »
    « Maltraitance religieuse des enfants ». Une autre attaque contre la liberté religieuse au Japon. 2. « Maltraitance psychologique »

    De nombreuses pratiques qualifiées de « maltraitance psychologique à caractère religieux » par les directives du ministère de la Santé, du Travail et des Affaires sociales ne sont que des expressions normales de la liberté religieuse.

  • Why “Cults” (and “Brainwashing”) Do Not Exist
    Why “Cults” (and “Brainwashing”) Do Not Exist

    An appeal to avoid labels that have no accepted scientific meaning and are used as tools of discrimination.

  • Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text
    Japans Religionsspenden-Gesetz. 1. Ein mehrdeutiger Text

    Das japanische Parlament hat Gesetze verabschiedet, die Spenden als betrügerisch einstufen, die durch „Angst“ motiviert sind und bei denen der „freie Wille“ der Spender angeblich unterdrückt wurde.

  • Media: Friends or Foes of Religious Freedom?
    Media: Friends or Foes of Religious Freedom?

    Silence, misrepresentation, and fake news transform one the most important allies of religious freedom into a pervasive and obnoxious enemy.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Wenzhou, Parents Asked to Sign a “Kindergarten Family Commitment Not to Believe in Religion” by He Yuyan
  • Empowering the Next Generation of Uyghurs to Challenge China’s Genocide by Marco Respinti
  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media” by Zhou Kexin
  • Thailand and Pakistan: No Friends of Uyghur Refugees by Marco Respinti
  • Russia, Hare Krishnas Accused of Planning Attacks Against Military Conscription Bureaus by Massimo Introvigne
  • Why “Cults” (and “Brainwashing”) Do Not Exist by Massimo Introvigne
  • A Uyghur View: Putin Got His Arrest Warrant—Xi Jinping Should Be Next by Kok Bayraq

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY