• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / Tai Ji Men

The Brazilian Experience and the Tai Ji Men Case

10/19/2021Francisco Tenorio |

Universal principles of qualified tax immunity for spiritual organizations should be applied to the case of Tai Ji Men.

by Francisco Tenorio

A paper presented at the webinar “There Is No Peace Without Justice: The Fight of Dr. Hong and the Tai Ji Men case,” co-organized by CESNUR and Human Rights Without Frontiers on September 20, 2021.

Tai Ji Men protests in Taipei.
Tai Ji Men protests in Taipei.

On September 7, 2021, which curiously coincided with the celebration of the 199th anniversary of the proclamation of the independence of the Brazilian Empire, I received an invitation from Massimo Introvigne to participate in an event about the Tai Ji Men case. With my team, I reviewed the material on Tai Ji Men published by CESNUR and Bitter Winter.

What struck me the most was the Taiwanese bureaucrats’ strategy of trying to combat the growth of the Tai Ji Men movement by means of a kind of “punishment” or“penalty” imposed on the institution.

That is why I would like to briefly mention the debates that exist in the Brazilian context and that can serve as a defensive thesis to challenge this persecution, among other things because the three legal principles applied in the cases I will mention exist in the legal systems of almost all democratic countries in the world.

First point. There is an historical reason why the institute of fiscal immunity for spiritual organizations  was born in law.

In ancient times, the figure of immunity of the temples and priests was due to the close connection that existed between the figure of the deity and the ruler, since the ancient state was essentially theocratic. An example of tax immunity resulting from this blending of state and religion is cited in the Biblical text of Genesis, when it narrates that in the times when Joseph was governor of Egypt, the priests of the Pharaoh possessed a portion of wealth given by the monarch and were exempt from contributing through taxes.

However, following the emergence of the modern secular state, the fiscal immunity of the religious institutions began to have a social foundation, and it seems to have emerged in England. It is linked to the history of the pension system for retirees and of social assistance. Prior to the emergence of the social  state and the state pension payment system for retirees, the Christian churches developed a welfare system in which the churches were able to provide social assistance. The churches set up funds to support the elderly and infirm who had no potential to survive by themselves. This was the “embryo” of the modern pension/retirement systems.

The fact that the churches fulfilled a state function of providing help to the poorest of the poor, and carried out assistance and social work with the resources that they had, was the main basis that led modern secular states to grant tax immunity to religious and spiritual institutions.

The best example of fiscal immunity of a religious institution is the immunity of the Catholic confraternities, since they are institutions whose purpose is charity through the maintenance of nursing homes, nurseries, orphanages, hospitals, etc. Eventually, tax immunity was recognized also to missionary agencies, which perform evangelistic as well as social work on behalf of the needy, and here we can cite the example of the Open Doors Ministry, whose purpose is to provide assistance to Christians in the countries where there is religious persecution against them. Spiritual help also benefits citizens and should be recognized by the state.

If an organization is genuinely providing spirituality, since any repressive fiscal practice of the State against spirituality is not legitimate, we can conclude that repressive fiscal practices against that institution are not legitimate.

It is clear to me that Tai Ji Men offers spirituality and promotes self-cultivation and other activities that are beneficial to the citizens. As a consequence, gifts given by members to the organization or the Master should be regarded as not taxable.  

Second point. In Brazil, we had a law proposal called Proposal 38723 presented to the Federal Senate to put an end to the benefit of tax immunity for religious and spiritual institutions. The argument used was that many religious leaders (in particular, the leaders of some Evangelical churches with a neo-Pentecostal orientation) availed themselves of the tax immunity benefit of the institutions they directed to commit tax evasion and money-laundering offenses for their private benefit.

However, the solution for these cases is not to revoke the institute of tax immunity for spiritual institutions, but to regulate it to make sure that it fulfills its social function. If some of the leaders of these institutions use improperly the tax benefits for their own enrichment, they should be punished. However, Proposal 38723 was finally rejected as a consensus emerged that it would not be fair to punish all spiritual organizations for the wrongdoing of the leaders of a few of them.

Worse still, there was the risk that under the false pretext of “controlling” and combating the illicit use of the institute of tax immunity, the government may in fact crack down on spiritual movements some politicians do not like.

It seems to me that this is exactly what happened in the Tai Ji Men cause. Under the pretext of combating “religious frauds,” Taiwan’s government has used its power of withholding tax immunity and repressing tax evasion as a form of  retaliation after Tai Ji men refused to compromise and renounce its core principles and values to please the dominant political group.

This is something that should be denounced through massive communication through social networks and international fora, asking the Taiwanese state to respect the principles of impartiality, and also of secularity, which implies that nobody should be discriminated because of religious or spiritual ideas, attitudes, or preferences.

A Masonic building in Brazil. Credits.
A Masonic building in Brazil. Credits.

Third point. When they want to tax spiritual organizations, states have a tendency to say that they are in fact not religious or spiritual, and should not be on the list of the spiritual groups that enjoy qualified immunity from taxation.

In Brazil,  we had a long court case about Freemasonry, because, although it is an institution which claimed the tax benefit granted to spiritual groups, it is not exactly a religious or spiritual institution, and in its constitutive statute it says this explicitly. Many of its members are also affiliated with churches and temples of different religions. Therefore, the Brazilian courts have denied Freemasonry the benefit of tax immunity as a religious or spiritual organization. Of course, the state cannot evaluate the beliefs of a group. It can only state whether they are part of spirituality or religion.

The case of Tai Ji Men is clearly different. It is true that Tai Ji Men, like Freemasonry in Brazil, has disciples (dizi) who maintain their individual religious faith and are not required to convert to Taoism, although Taoism is the source of inspiration for Tai Ji Men. However, even in Brazil it would be recognized that the case of Tai Ji Men is different. Tai Ji Men is a spiritual institution, since its members come together to learn teachings and practices related to spirituality.

Therefore, Tai Ji Men is an institution within the field of spirituality, which means that gifts given by dizi to their Master are not taxable. By denying this, the Taiwanese state has used its supervisory power in the tax field as a means to

violate the principles of impartiality and secularity, which imply that  the state cannot take sides and should treat all forms of spirituality equally and impartially. In fact, tax bills have been used as an instrument of discrimination and persecution of Tai Ji Men.

Based on  these three points of my analysis, I would conclude with a message for Tai Ji Men and one for the authorities in Taiwan. The government of Taiwan should solve the Tai Ji Men case in accordance with the universally recognized principle of qualified tax immunity for spiritual communities. And Tai Ji Men deserves our gratitude and support for what they do on behalf of religious freedom and tax justice.

Tagged With: Brazil, Tai Ji Men, Taiwan

Francisco Tenorio
Francisco Tenorio

Francisco Tenorio is an attorney based in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, specialized in human rights and religious liberty, a field in which he has published and lectured extensively. He is also a corresponding member of Academia Evangélica de Letras do Brasil, one of Brazil’s leading literary academies.

Related articles

  • Tax Reform Volunteer Walks Around Taiwan for Love and Justice

    Tax Reform Volunteer Walks Around Taiwan for Love and Justice

  • Peace for Tai Ji Men Means Peace for All Taiwan

    Peace for Tai Ji Men Means Peace for All Taiwan

  • Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan

    Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan

  • The Power of the Media and the Tai Ji Men Case

    The Power of the Media and the Tai Ji Men Case

Keep Reading

  • A Conscience-Based Citizen Diplomacy to Solve the Tai Ji Men Case
    A Conscience-Based Citizen Diplomacy to Solve the Tai Ji Men Case

    Celebrating the International Day of Multilateralism and Diplomacy, scholars and witnesses from three different continents discussed how the long-lasting case may be finally solved.

  • The Right to Know the Truth on the Tai Ji Men Case
    The Right to Know the Truth on the Tai Ji Men Case

    The time has come to proclaim the truth on a serious case of blatant violation of freedom of religion or belief.

  • Conscience Education, Spirituality, and Tai Ji Men: An Emic View
    Conscience Education, Spirituality, and Tai Ji Men: An Emic View

    Conscience is at the center of Tai Ji Men’s educational project. It is a the core of hundred of international events the group has organized.

  • Tai Ji Men in Leuven: Dizi Sing, Speak, and Present Their Case in a Leading Academic Conference
    Tai Ji Men in Leuven: Dizi Sing, Speak, and Present Their Case in a Leading Academic Conference

    Belgium’s academic capital hosts an important yearly conference on freedom of religion and belief. Tai Ji Men dizi were there.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • There Are Christian Uyghurs, Too: New Organization Launched in London by Ruth Ingram
  • The Last Words of a Uyghur Father: A Son’s Memory by Abdurehim Gheni Uyghur
  • Xi Jinping: Beijing’ National Art Museum Is Not Socialist Enough by Hu Zimo
  • Occupied Ukraine: Anti-Cult “Experts” Target Moscow Patriarchate Dissident Priest by Massimo Introvigne
  • Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot by Massimo Introvigne
  • Russia: Lunatic Theory that Yellowstone Volcano Caused the War in Ukraine Gains Momentum by Massimo Introvigne
  • Vandalism Against Catholic Churches on the Rise in Bavaria by PierLuigi Zoccatelli

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY