• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / Documents and Translations

Georgia: A Letter on the New Defense Law

04/10/2023FoRB Roundtable Brussels EU |

The FoRB Roundtable Brussels-EU expresses concerns about a law threatening conscientious objection and thus freedom of religion or belief.

by FoRB Roundtable Brussels EU

The letter as sent,
The letter as sent.

To:                  Mr. Irakli Gharibashvili
Prime Minister of Georgia

Mr. Shalva Papuashvili
Chairman of the Parliament of Georgia

Copies to:       Prof. Nazila Ghanea
The UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief

Mr. Frans van Daele
The UE Special Envoy for the Promotion of Freedom of Religion or Belief

Mr. Rashad Hussain
The Ambassador at Large, the U.S. Department of State Office of International Religious Freedom

Dr. Kishan Manocha
The OSCE/ODIHR Head of the Department on Tolerance and Non- Discrimination

Dr. Susan Kerr
The OSCE/ODIHR Senior Adviser on Freedom of Religion or Belief

Brussels, the 24 March 2022

Joint Letter on Georgia’s New Defense Code

Dear Prime Minister,

Dear Chairman of the Parliament,

We write as a group of organizations and individuals who are scholars, religious and secular leaders, human rights advocates and practitioners concerned with the draft law of Georgia’s

Defense Code submitted by the Government of Georgia to the Parliament of Georgia, in December 2022. In fact, the adoption of the draft law will annul the possibility for Ministers of Minority Religions, but the Georgian Orthodox Church, to beneficiate from the exemption for Compulsory Military Service.

The signatories of this letter welcome all efforts of Georgian authorities to strengthen the National Security and Defensive Capacity of Georgia. Especially, in response to the military aggressions committed by the Russian Federation against Georgia throughout the last decades and the current war waged by the Russian Federation against Ukraine. According to the National Security Concept of Georgia, the country’s security along with the right to the military defense of the territorial integrity of Georgia is based on such essential values as ensuring the protection of Human Rights and Freedoms, as well as Democracy and the Rule of Law. We sincerely believe that Georgia’s new Defense Code serves these worthy ideals. However, the submitted Draft Law poses a serious challenge to the Fundamental Right to Equality and Non- Discrimination based on religion and belief.

We support following basic principles and judgements in this respect:

  1. The Ministerial Exception (deferment of conscription into Compulsory Military Service), as opposed to an exemption from the Compulsory Military Service based on conscientious objection, is not a Right protected by the Freedom of Religion or Belief, but a Privilege granted to the ministers of religion considering the public importance of their status and by the political will of the State.
  2. Nevertheless, since the State itself grants any special Privilege or Status to the ministers of religion, above and beyond its obligations under the Freedom of Religion or Belief, it cannot deny this advantage to specified religious group in a discriminatory manner contrary to the Fundamental Right to Equality and Non-Discrimination based on religion and belief. Thus, when Georgian State grants special deferment of conscription into Compulsory Military Service to the ministers of the Orthodox Church of Georgia, all other religious groups which so wish, must have a fair opportunity to apply for the same Privilege in a non-discriminatory manner.
  3. We understand well, that the submitted Draft Law intends to eliminate the legislative gap that allows “unscrupulous” and “false” religious organizations to help individuals avoid Compulsory Military Service. Still, according to the modern principles of Democracy and the Freedom of Religion the State should not relieve any of its burden at the expense of the Fundamental Rights and Freedoms of individuals or groups. In this regard, the State has a responsibility to eliminate solely the abusing practice and not the Right to Equality and Non- Discrimination based on religion and belief, entirely.
  4. We further find a risk of discrimination in amendments to the Law on Georgia on Non- military, Alternative Labor Service. In particular, according to the draft amendment the ground for releasing a citizen from compulsory military service and performance of non-military, alternative labor service, along with conscientious objection, will also be the status of a Minister. According to the Georgian Authorities, this Privilege will replace the withdrawn Ministerial Exception, as this new legal regulation will apply equally to the Ministers of all religions, including the Orthodox Church of Georgia. However, this interpretation is not valid, as the Constitutional Agreement of Georgia explicitly prohibits State from conscripting Ministers of the Orthodox Church of Georgia into Compulsory Military Service. Thus, as a result, if the submitted draft is adopted, the Orthodox Ministers will be unconditionally exempted from compulsory military service, while the Ministers of all other religions will be subject to non-military, alternative labor service.
  5. We also comprehend well, that existing legislative system – legal nature of the Constitutional Agreement of Georgia – does not give the State the power to unilaterally decide the issue regarding the Ministers of the Orthodox Church of Georgia without the bilateral agreement with the Orthodox Church of Georgia of the Church, which in itself heightens the arising risk of Discrimination even more.

Therefore, taking into account that the Right to Equality Before the Law is guaranteed by the Constitution of Georgia, and Georgia is also a contracting party of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Convention on Human Rights, we respectfully request this Draft Law be revoked or amended in accordance with the principle of Equality Before the Law guaranteed above mentioned national and international acts.

We would be more than happy to meet with and assist with appropriate representatives in charge of Georgia if they would feel this appropriate.

Respectfully,

Organizations

Institute for Religious Freedom of the University of Georgia (Georgia)

Asian Children’s Education Fellowship (USA)

Bitter Winter, a daily magazine on religious liberty and human rights (Italy)

CESNUR, Center for Studies on New Religions (Italy)

Church of Scientology National Affairs Office Washington, DC (USA)

Coordination des Associations et des Particuliers pour la Liberté de Conscience (France)

European Evangelical Alliance (Switzerland)

European Interreligious Forum for Religious Freedom (France – Belgium)

Fundacion para la Mejora de la Vida, la Cultura y la Sociedad – NGO with Special Consultative Status to the UN ECOSOC (Spain)

Gerard Noodt Foundation for Freedom of Religion or Belief (The Netherlands)

International Society for Peace & Justice (USA)

ORLIR, International Observatory of Religious Liberty of Refugees (Italy)

Parity (USA)

The Center for Studies on Freedom of Religion Belief and Conscience (LIREC) (Italy)

Individuals

Professor Dr Eileen Barker, FAcSS, FBA, OBE
Professor Emeritus, London School of Economics

Prof. Dr Jelle Creemers
ISFORB/ETF Leuven

Rev. Marian Edmonds-Allen
Executive Director, Parity

Prof. Dr. Dimitry Gegenava
Vice Rector
Sulkhan-Saba Orbeliani University

Michael Jenkins
President
Universal Peace Federation International

Rehan Khan MD MS
President
International Society for Peace & Justice

Prof. Dr. Archil Metreveli
Head of the Institute for Religious Freedom The University of Georgia

Scott Morgan
President
Red Eagle Enterprises
Co-Chair Africa Working Group IRF Roundtable Washington, DC

Bryan Nerren
President
Asian Children’s Education Fellowship

Hans Noot
President
Gerard Noodt Foundation for Freedom of Religion or Belief

Marco Respinti
Director-in-Charge
Bitter Winter, A Magazine on Religious Liberty and Human Rights.

Eric Roux
President
European Interreligious Forum for Religious Freedom

Tagged With: Georgia, Religious Liberty

FoRB roundtable
FoRB Roundtable Brussels EU

The FoRB Roundtable Brussels-EU is an informal group of individuals from civil society who gather regularly to discuss FoRB (Freedom of Religion or Belief) issues. More than 100 NGOs and governmental organisations regularly participate to the Roundtable Brussels-EU.

Related articles

  • Loup Blanc. 2. A Community in Search of Self-Liberation

    Loup Blanc. 2. A Community in Search of Self-Liberation

  • Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia

    Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia

  • 米国務省の信教の自由に関する2023年版報告書:敵に厳しく、味方に甘い

    米国務省の信教の自由に関する2023年版報告書:敵に厳しく、味方に甘い

  • Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot

    Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot

Keep Reading

  • Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin
    Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin

    How Article 19 and Article 18 (UDHR) are connected. and why journalists and faith communities need each other

  • “Deadly Fasting” in Kenya: What We Know So Far
    “Deadly Fasting” in Kenya: What We Know So Far

    Pastor Paul Makenzie Nthenge of Good News International Church is accused of having persuaded several dozen members to fast until death. 

  • 「宗教に関係する児童虐待」: 日本における信教の自由に対する新たな攻撃 1.“虐待”の新たな定義
    「宗教に関係する児童虐待」: 日本における信教の自由に対する新たな攻撃 1.“虐待”の新たな定義

    厚生労働省のガイドライン 親が子どもに宗教を教える権利を大幅に制限

  • Is Baptism Becoming a Religious Liberty Issue? An Interview with Francesco Arduini
    Is Baptism Becoming a Religious Liberty Issue? An Interview with Francesco Arduini

    An interview with Italian scholar Francesco Arduini. He favors baptism at an adult age but defends the right of other Christians to administer it to infants.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • Sinicization of Christianity Comes to Hong Kong by Gladys Kwok
  • The Last Words of a Uyghur Father: A Son’s Memory by Abdurehim Gheni Uyghur
  • China: Theological Seminaries Inspected to Check How “Sinicized” They Are by Zhang Chunhua
  • Occupied Ukraine: Anti-Cult “Experts” Target Moscow Patriarchate Dissident Priest by Massimo Introvigne
  • Xi Jinping: Beijing’ National Art Museum Is Not Socialist Enough by Hu Zimo
  • France, Sonia Backès Caught Red-Handed Again: A “Religious Profiling” of Muslim Students in Schools by Massimo Introvigne
  • Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY