• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / Tai Ji Men

A Tale of Two COVIDs: Zero Discrimination, Religious Liberty, and Tai Ji Men

03/08/2023Massimo Introvigne |

Other groups have been more successful than religious liberty advocates in fighting discrimination. This should change.

by Massimo Introvigne*

*A paper presented at the webinar “Zero Discrimination for Tai Ji Men,” co-organized by CESNUR and Human Rights Without Frontiers on March 1, 2023, United Nations Zero Discrimination Day.

South Koreans queuing to be tested, an artistic memory of the COVID-19 pandemic by Choi Kwang-mo. Credits.
South Koreans queuing to be tested, an artistic memory of the COVID-19 pandemic by Choi Kwang-mo. Credits.

United Nations days of observance are in the calendar because somebody proposed them. Zero Discrimination Day was promoted by LGBT organizations and others living with HIV/AIDS who felt discriminated. UN days then take a life of their own, and Zero Discrimination Day has been in recent years the opportunity to advocate for a variety of causes.

I would like to return, however, to the original connection between Zero Discrimination Day and the rights of homosexual persons not to be discriminated or, worse, beaten and killed. These rights should be reaffirmed today, when violence against homosexual persons is becoming systematic in two countries that have an abysmally low human rights record in general, Russia and Iran.

I admire the capability of the LGBT community to mobilize when their rights are violated in one country. There is no doubt that they were successful in making their case heard internationally. We who work in the field of freedom of religious or belief should both learn from them and candidly acknowledge that we have been somewhat less successful. I will illustrate it with an example from South Korea.

In 2020, two South Korean scholars, Joseph Yi and Lee Wondong, analyzed the “pandemic nationalism” that developed in their country and led the “government to infringing on the civil liberties” and to massive “human right violations.” While the government’s successes in handling the pandemic were initially praised by international media, this “praise of the South Korean model noticeably subsided in May 2020,” replaced by an increasing number of articles on its human rights cost.

What happened in May 2020 was that an important cluster of COVID-19

infections was discovered in the area of Itaewon, in Seoul, which hosts bars and saunas for gay men. This led the health authorities to a second attempt to gather names and addresses of members of a community, after the first one that had involved Shincheonji, a new religious movement that has been accused of “spreading the plague” after a misdiagnosed member had infected many co-religionists. This time, the male gay community in Seoul was targeted. Some media and politicians published derogatory remarks depicting homosexuals as ignoring preventive measures against COVID. Just as in the case of Shincheonji, the accusations were false. Later Korean judges up to the Supreme Court found Shincheonji not guilty of any COVID-related violation and even praised the anti-COVID measures it had taken.

Yi and Lee find similarities as well as differences in the COVID-related “rights violations” involving respectively Shincheonji and the LGBT community in Seoul. In both cases, “unconventional religious or sexual minorities” were targeted, connecting COVID-19 with what was depicted as “immoral behavior that defied the national interest.” However, the LGBT community was able to quickly mobilize international human rights groups, which persuaded foreign governments to protest and the South Korean authorities (although not some local media) to back off. By contrast, Shincheonji remained “the most vilified group during the pandemic.” As Yi and Lee note, international scholars of new religious movements, most of them associated with CESNUR, did protest the violations of human rights of Shincheonji members, and got the attention of USCIRF in the United States and some media, including “The New York Times,” which somewhat revised its initial coverage based on “the ‘cult’ frame of the Korean media.”

USCIRF tweet on the Shincheonji human rights case.
USCIRF tweet on the Shincheonji human rights case.

Overall, however, Shincheonji failed to receive the “strong, sympathetic gaze from western media” that greatly benefited the Seoul LGBT community when it came under attack, and continued to be depicted as “a secretive, harmful ‘cult,” with the implication that, guilty or not, it deserved what it has been done to it.

In this story, there is an important lesson, and one relevant for the Tai Ji Men case as well. Freedom of religion or belief (FOB) is a fundamental human right. However, when it comes to coverage in international media and the mobilization of international organizations, FOB often appears to be the Cinderella of human rights. This is the fault of an international media system that is not sympathetic to religion and spirituality, to say the least, and of decades of anti-religious campaigns that have targeted particularly the groups stigmatized as “cults.” But it is also our fault. All of us did a lot to promote FOB, but obviously something is still missing.

The Tai Ji Men case is further evidence of this. If you look at the coverage of human rights issues in Taiwan through Google News, you will find that the Tai Ji Men case is mentioned, thanks in particular to Bitter Winter. However, most articles about human rights in Taiwan other than ours mostly or only mention problems connected with foreign workers, particularly foreign fishermen aboard Taiwanese vessels.

Tai Ji Men protests in Taipei.
Tai Ji Men protests in Taipei.

The human rights of these foreign workers should be protected, but all of us who have studied the Tai Ji Men case know that it would surely deserve more attention, and that there are gross violations of the human rights of taxpayers in general.

Google itself shows that we did a lot, but we should do more. It is a Taiwanese problem, as the country should not ignore FOB and taxpayers’ rights problems, and it is an international problem. We should all work to make FOB from the Cinderella that it is in the media the princess she deserves to be.

Tagged With: Covid-19, Tai Ji Men, Taiwan

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Tai Ji Men: No Fraternity Without Justice. An Islamic Perspective

    Tai Ji Men: No Fraternity Without Justice. An Islamic Perspective

  • Zero Discrimination Against Tai Ji Men

    Zero Discrimination Against Tai Ji Men

  • Tai Ji Men Dizi: Children of a Lesser Father?

    Tai Ji Men Dizi: Children of a Lesser Father?

  • Seeking Justice for Tai Ji Men on Taiwan’s Judicial Day

    Seeking Justice for Tai Ji Men on Taiwan’s Judicial Day

Keep Reading

  • There Can Be No Social Justice Without Tax Justice: The Tai Ji Men Case
    There Can Be No Social Justice Without Tax Justice: The Tai Ji Men Case

    Scholars and human rights activists discussed tax reform and the injustice vested on Tai Ji Men on World Day of Social Justice

  • Francis of Assisi, Fraternity, and Tai Ji Men
    Francis of Assisi, Fraternity, and Tai Ji Men

    One of the origins of the International Day of Human Fraternity is the Italian mystic’s visit to Sultan al-Kamil in 1219. Its message is valid for the Tai Ji Men case, too.

  • Tai Ji Men at the IRF Summit 2023: Collaborative Action for Justice
    Tai Ji Men at the IRF Summit 2023: Collaborative Action for Justice

    A breakout session of the world’s largest freedom of religion or belief event discussed the Tai Ji Men case and the “Declaration of the International Day Against Judicial and Tax Persecution by State Power.”

  • The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet
    The Weaponization of the CCP’s “Zero COVID” Against Tibet

    Have the Chinese lockdown measures been a tool for more surveillance and control? And are the antigenic tests on Tibetans connected with organ harvesting?

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • Empowering the Next Generation of Uyghurs to Challenge China’s Genocide by Marco Respinti
  • Wenzhou, Parents Asked to Sign a “Kindergarten Family Commitment Not to Believe in Religion” by He Yuyan
  • Censorship Frenzy: Do Not Search for “2952” in China or You Will Get Into Trouble  by Tan Liwei
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne
  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media” by Zhou Kexin
  • Thailand and Pakistan: No Friends of Uyghur Refugees by Marco Respinti

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY