• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / Tai Ji Men

Tolerance of the Intolerants and the Tai Ji Men Case

11/25/2022Massimo Introvigne |

An old but wrong idea is that those with intolerant ideas should not be tolerated. In fact, we are all intolerant of something.

by Massimo Introvigne*

*A paper presented at the webinar “Tolerance for Tai Ji Men,” co- organized by CESNUR and Human Rights Without Frontiers on November 16, 2022, United Nations International Day of Tolerance.

Voltaire on a French banknote of 1963. Credits.
Voltaire on a French banknote of 1963. Credits.

Although the word existed before, and some early theories had been advanced in the United Kingdom, the first comprehensive theory of tolerance was developed by the French Enlightenment philosophers, particularly by Voltaire. It can be summarized in one sentence: the state should tolerate all religions and philosophies, except those that are themselves intolerant.

At first sight, it looks like a logical construction. If we look deeper into it, however, we realize it is a totally wrong theory, and the root cause of some of the worst tragedies in the Western world and beyond. Voltaire’s definition had a specific target, the Roman Catholic Church. Since the Catholics were intolerant and claimed theirs was the only true religion, a secular state should not tolerate them. In fact, they should be persecuted, according to Voltaire’s motto “Écrasez l’infâme,” “Destroy the infamous one,” i.e., the Catholic Church.

Catholic critics answered from the beginning that, since he was intolerant towards the Catholics, by applying his own definition of tolerance the state he had in mind should not tolerate Voltaire either. This was as a good ad hominem argument but somewhat missed the larger picture. The fact is that all religious and philosophical doctrines are intolerant of something or somebody, except perhaps absolute relativism, but even the latter would not be tolerant of those who are not relativists.

A pacifist would be intolerant of those who believe that some wars are just; an ecologist would be intolerant of those who pollute, and so on. By excluding the intolerants from the scope of tolerance, Voltaire reduced tolerance to an empty box. Worse, he prepared the atrocities of the Terror of the French Revolution, which was in turn the model of Communist terror. Millions were killed by proclaiming they had no right to tolerance because they were themselves intolerant.

Anti-Catholic caricature of the French Revolution, 1789. “Let’s hope this game will soon end”: the poor people carries on its back the Catholic priest and his friend, the aristocrat. From Twitter.
Anti-Catholic caricature of the French Revolution, 1789. “Let’s hope this game will soon end”: the poor people carries on its back the Catholic priest and his friend, the aristocrat. From Twitter.

In the religious field, Voltaire’s tradition continues even today. In Russia, a law bans as “extremist” those “intolerant” religions teaching that they preach a truth superior or more comprehensive than other religions. Of course, all religions do this, including the Russian Orthodox Church, which is however protected by other regulations. I never met a religionist who told me, “Let me introduce my religion, which perhaps is true and perhaps is not true.” Clearly the Russian law is a tool that can be used against all religions, and in fact is used against those the government does not like.

In France, Voltaire’s own country, a law against “separatism” and the continuous action of the governmental mission against “cultic deviances” MIVILUDES harass all high-intensity religious groups, particularly those labeled as “cults.” One of the criteria identifying them as “cults” is that they teach their members that only their path leads to truth and salvation, making them intolerant of other groups and separated from the common values of the French Republic rooted in the tradition of Voltaire.

Again, a grandchild of the Catholic apologists who first answered Voltaire may easily object that anti-cultists are an egregious example of intolerance, because they reserve the right to label as “cults” and persecute the groups they have decided they are not prepared to tolerate.

Statue and grave of Voltaire, Panthéon, Paris. Credits.
Statue and grave of Voltaire, Panthéon, Paris. Credits.

Are they limits to tolerance? Yes, otherwise we should all tolerate terrorism or pedophilia. However, limits should be interpreted restrictively. Americans were so scared by the French Terror that their courts adopted a broad concept of tolerance of obnoxious ideas, as opposite to criminal actions, which continues to this very day. For example, American courts have consistently allowed Nazi parades, unless participants commit or incite to commit acts of violence. Europe has a different approach, but where Nazism is prohibited it is not because it is intolerant, it is because justifying and advocating violence and crimes against Jews and others is part of its essence.

We should not tolerate violence, incitement to violence, or incitement to commit other common crimes. But a democratic state should tolerate different religious worldviews, most of which are intolerant of other worldviews or lifestyles. The dramatic mistake of Voltaire should be corrected by proclaiming that religions and philosophies have a right to be in different ways intolerant, and should still be tolerated.

By all normal logical standards, Tai Ji Men promotes one of the most tolerant worldviews ever. Yet, it became a victim of persecution rooted, as Gordon Melton explained in last month’s hybrid seminar in Walnut, in a bureaucratic attitude cracking down on all those who have strong ideas based on religious or spiritual principles.

Tai Ji Men protests in Taiwan.
Tai Ji Men protests in Taiwan.

Tai Ji Men dizi are not protected by a Voltaire-style notion of tolerance and, even being the most tolerant persons in the world, may always be accused of intolerance. By insisting on conscience, perhaps they are intolerant of those who do not believe in the primacy of conscience. By opposing tax bonuses, perhaps they are intolerant of those tax bureaucrats who believe in bonuses with the same fervor others believe in religion.

A limited notion of tolerance sooner or later generates intolerance. On International Day of Tolerance, we should insist on tolerance for all law-abiding citizens, based not on their belief and not even on their own practice of tolerance, but on their inviolable dignity as human beings. 

Tagged With: Tai Ji Men, Taiwan

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Father Kolbe, Press Freedom, and the Tai Ji Men Case

    Father Kolbe, Press Freedom, and the Tai Ji Men Case

  • To Taiwan from Friends: Correct Wrongdoings Against Tai Ji Men, Now

    To Taiwan from Friends: Correct Wrongdoings Against Tai Ji Men, Now

  • Living Together in Peace and the Tai Ji Men Case

    Living Together in Peace and the Tai Ji Men Case

  • Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin

    Freedom of the Press and Religious Liberty: Two Sides of The Same Coin

Keep Reading

  • “War and Peace” and the Tai Ji Men Case
    “War and Peace” and the Tai Ji Men Case

    Falsified by Stalin and now Putin, Tolstoy’s thought was that war is senseless but injustice remains intolerable and should be resisted through non-violent means.

  • Conscience Education, Spirituality, and Tai Ji Men: An Emic View
    Conscience Education, Spirituality, and Tai Ji Men: An Emic View

    Conscience is at the center of Tai Ji Men’s educational project. It is a the core of hundred of international events the group has organized.

  • Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan
    Black Magic, False “Victims,” and “Religious Fraud”: Parallels Between the Cases of the Unification Church in Japan and Tai Ji Men in Taiwan

    While certain features of criticism against “cults” are international, others are typical of the Sinosphere and are present in both cases.

  • Police  Raids, Media Slander, and the Tai Ji Men Case: Comparing Taiwan with Argentina
    Police  Raids, Media Slander, and the Tai Ji Men Case: Comparing Taiwan with Argentina

    Prosecutors who  attacked groups stigmatized as “cults” and slandered them through the media have even active in several countries. Their wrongdoings need to be exposed.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • There Are Christian Uyghurs, Too: New Organization Launched in London by Ruth Ingram
  • The Last Words of a Uyghur Father: A Son’s Memory by Abdurehim Gheni Uyghur
  • Xi Jinping: Beijing’ National Art Museum Is Not Socialist Enough by Hu Zimo
  • Occupied Ukraine: Anti-Cult “Experts” Target Moscow Patriarchate Dissident Priest by Massimo Introvigne
  • Chinese Agents Tried to Bribe U.S. Tax Officer in Anti-Falun-Gong Plot by Massimo Introvigne
  • Russia: Lunatic Theory that Yellowstone Volcano Caused the War in Ukraine Gains Momentum by Massimo Introvigne
  • Vandalism Against Catholic Churches on the Rise in Bavaria by PierLuigi Zoccatelli

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY