• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / Tai Ji Men

Only By Solving the Tai Ji Men Case Taiwan Will Become Fully “Independent”

01/26/2023Marco Respinti |

It is not enough to be independent from foreign jurisdictions. The legal system should also be independent from private interests and malice.

by Marco Respinti*

*A paper presented at the webinar “A Real, Independent Justice for Tai Ji Men” co-organized by CESNUR and Human Rights Without Frontiers on January 11, 2023, Taiwan’s Judicial Day.

Seeking “independent” justice: Tai Ji Men protests in Taiwan.
Seeking “independent” justice: Tai Ji Men protests in Taiwan.

Today the Republic of China celebrates its Judicial Day, marking the day when, in 1943, Taiwan became independent from any foreign jurisdiction. This is a pivotal aspect of Taiwan, which is a bastion of freedom and democracy in an area of the world where democracy and freedom are a rare commodity.

From August 26 to September 6, 1985, the United Nations held their Seventh Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders in my town, Milan, Italy. On the final day, September 6, 1985, that UN Congress adopted a text that all should read and study, and constantly recall. It is called “Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary.” On the Judicial Day of the Republic of China this year, let me share the first two articles of that important document.

The first reads: “The independence of the judiciary shall be guaranteed by the State and enshrined in the Constitution or the law of the country. It is the duty of all governmental and other institutions to respect and observe the independence of the judiciary.”

The second reads: “The judiciary shall decide matters before them impartially, on the basis of facts and in accordance with the law, without any restrictions, improper influences, inducements, pressures, threats or interferences, direct or indirect, from any quarter or for any reason.”

The Seventh Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Milano, 1985. From Twitter.
The Seventh Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Milano, 1985. From Twitter.

With these words, the Unites Nations teaches and reminds us that the state itself should regard the independence of the judiciary as almost sacred, and that the first single aim of the judicial system of a country is impartiality, which is the other name of justice itself.

At least three key words and concepts emerge from these introductory reflections. Not by chance, at least two of them are part of the title of our webinar today, the third being just the direct and logic conclusion of them.

The three words are “independence,” “justice,” and “democracy.” “Independence” and “justice” are the two words evoked in our title, and they lead to the third, “democracy.” Let me explore them briefly.

“Independence” means not being subject or subordinate to others: to no people, no organizations, no foreign state. Not even to churches and religious organizations. Of course, believers are bound by the doctrine and morals upheld by the church or religious organization they belong to, but this does not mean that a church or a religious organizations should dictate every single act of the believers. It does not mean, on the other hand, that believers should ignore the teachings and directions of the church or religious organization they are part of. It means that a balance between obedience and autonomy is to be sought, and possibly found.

Here, the history of the Christian Middle Ages in the West is an important case study. It alternated between at least three main attitudes. The first was the temptation of theocracy, when the church pretended to impose its authority to the political power. The second is the danger of secularism, when the state regarded itself as separated and paramount rather than only distinct from the church. The third attitude can be called a symphony between the two powers, temporal and spiritual, which guaranteed a balance between freedom and due respect for the authority. Of course, this third option was an ideal, very much difficult to achieve and maintain.

Independence is not the despotic rule of an egoistic self, but the responsible self-government of a person’s conscience, the feature of truly adult citizens who are able to decide for themselves and also to take wise advices.

The second concept and word I mentioned is “justice.” Contrary to what we may generally think, justice is not an end: it is a means. It is not a goal in itself, but it serves a purpose. In fact, justice is a way to achieve good: the common good, or the good of all human beings living in a social and historical context, as well as what is good for an individual and for his or her salvation. Good is the goal, and justice is the way to achieve it. So, justice always makes choices, sometimes difficult, and rules in the name of good. When it discriminates and choses for purposes other than good, it rules arbitrarily and becomes its opposite: injustice.

The Greek philosopher Aristotle (384–322 BC) eloquently addressed the nature of justice, defining it as the means to achieve the goal, which is the good. In his “Nicomachean Ethics,” he stated that justice is not a matter of giving to everyone equally, but of giving to all their due. Aristotle implied that to treat human beings with equity, justice ought to make differences among them. This same concept entered Roman law, and then served as the basis of Medieval and modern legal practice in most of Europe.

Lysippos (390–300 BCE), Bust of Aristotle (copy). Credits.
Lysippos (390–300 BCE), Bust of Aristotle (copy). Credits.

The third concept and word is “democracy.” Many think that democracy is just a type of political regime. It is not. According to classical political philosophy, originating again with Aristotle, there are three forms of government: monarchy, or the rule of one sovereign; aristocracy, or the rule of the best people; and republic, or the rule of many through their elected representatives. Democracy is a description of the way by which these three forms of government govern. When, in one form or another, mediately or immediately, people participate in the political life of a nation, there is democracy. All the three mentioned forms of government, monarchy, aristocracy and republic, are democratic if, in one form or another, citizens are represented and can freely participate in the political life of a nation. If citizens cannot participate freely in the political life of a nation, tyranny substitutes monarchy, oligarchy as the rule of the dispotic few comes in instead of aristocracy (which is the rule of the “best,” “aristoi” in Greek), and demagogy, or the rule of ideology, sophistry, and propaganda, takes the place of  republic. The mark of these latter three forms of government is to be undemocratic.

Monarchy, aristocracy, and republic can all provide a good government for the people, as opposed to tyranny, oligarchy, and demagogy, if they rule over society to secure good: the common good of many, and the individual good of each citizen. To achieve this goal, all just forms of government must always act through justice, independently from all improper influence. This is why and how only independence and justice can grant true democracy.

To say it differently, human beings can enjoy the liberties and beauties of true democracy only when justice is independent, or the judicial system of a country does not depend on external conditioning.

The Tai Ji Men case perfectly illustrates what I described so far. Taiwan is a democracy, but if its judicial system is conditioned by greed, ideology, corruption, and malevolence, then Taiwan ceases to be a full democracy.

If its judicial system is incapable to redress the wrongs done to loyal citizens such as Tai Ji Men’s Shifu, of Grand Master, and dizi, or disciples, then Taiwan fails to correspond to the model of a full democracy.

If Taiwan’s system of justice is flawed because its independence from personal interests and malice is not granted, then Taiwanese citizens such as Tai Ji Men’s Shifu and dizi suffer injustice.

Sin and evil will never be eradicated from humanity, but human beings have the moral duty to tame, contain, and battle sin as much as possible. Since politics is the art of governing people for that supreme goal that is good, let us hope that, on Taiwan’s Judicial Day, Taiwan’s politics would find a way to regain its independence from the wrongdoings of some of its branches and corrupt officials, and consider the solution of the Tai Ji Men case as a top priority. Only in this way will Taiwan become a full-blown democracy.

Tagged With: Tai Ji Men, Taiwan

Marco Respinti
Marco Respinti

Marco Respinti is an Italian professional journalist, member of the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ), essayist, translator, and lecturer. He has contributed and contributes to several journals and magazines both in print and online, both in Italy and abroad. Author of books and chapter in books, he has translated and/or edited works by, among others, Edmund Burke, Charles Dickens, T.S. Eliot, Russell Kirk, J.R.R. Tolkien, Régine Pernoud and Gustave Thibon. A Senior fellow at the Russell Kirk Center for Cultural Renewal (a non-partisan, non-profit U.S. educational organization based in Mecosta, Michigan), he is also a founding member as well as a member of the Advisory Council of the Center for European Renewal (a non-profit, non-partisan pan-European educational organization based in The Hague, The Netherlands). A member of the Advisory Council of the European Federation for Freedom of Belief, in December 2022, the Universal Peace Federation bestowed on him, among others, the title of Ambassador of Peace. From February 2018 to December 2022, he has been the Editor-in-Chief of International Family News. He serves as Director-in-Charge of the academic publication The Journal of CESNUR and Bitter Winter: A Magazine on Religious Liberty and Human Rights.

Related articles

  • “Paideia” and Tai Ji Men

    “Paideia” and Tai Ji Men

  • For Whom the Bell Tolls: Collective Imaginaries and the Tai Ji Men Case

    For Whom the Bell Tolls: Collective Imaginaries and the Tai Ji Men Case

  • Taxes as a Weapon of Mass Persecution: The Tai Ji Men Case

    Taxes as a Weapon of Mass Persecution: The Tai Ji Men Case

  • Education By and About Tai Ji Men

    Education By and About Tai Ji Men

Keep Reading

  • Education and the Tai Ji Men Case
    Education and the Tai Ji Men Case

    Scholars and human rights activists praised Tai Ji Men’s role in spreading conscience education, and denounced the movement’s continuing tax harassment.

  • The Great Bengal Famine of 1770: When Taxes Created a Genocide
    The Great Bengal Famine of 1770: When Taxes Created a Genocide

    The sudden rise of land revenue taxes, together with drought, caused what some now call a genocide, which killed from one to ten million Bengalis and Biharis.

  • Tai Ji Men: From the “White Terror” to the Terror of Persecution
    Tai Ji Men: From the “White Terror” to the Terror of Persecution

    After the Martial Law was lifted, not all the problems of democracy were solved in Taiwan, as the Tai Ji Men case demonstrates.

  • Francis of Assisi, Fraternity, and Tai Ji Men
    Francis of Assisi, Fraternity, and Tai Ji Men

    One of the origins of the International Day of Human Fraternity is the Italian mystic’s visit to Sultan al-Kamil in 1219. Its message is valid for the Tai Ji Men case, too.

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • More Uyghur Criticism of Donnie Yen: Wasn’t He More Guilty than Will Smith? by Kok Bayraq
  • Empowering the Next Generation of Uyghurs to Challenge China’s Genocide by Marco Respinti
  • Censorship Frenzy: Do Not Search for “2952” in China or You Will Get Into Trouble  by Tan Liwei
  • Russia: Pastor Moskvitin Sentenced to 1.5 Years in Penal Colony for “Brainwashing” by Massimo Introvigne
  • China’s New Crackdown Targets “Self-Media” by Zhou Kexin
  • Wenzhou, Parents Asked to Sign a “Kindergarten Family Commitment Not to Believe in Religion” by He Yuyan
  • Russia, Hare Krishnas Accused of Planning Attacks Against Military Conscription Bureaus by Massimo Introvigne

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY