• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
  • HOME
  • ABOUT CHINA
    • NEWS
    • TESTIMONIES
    • OP-EDS
    • FEATURED
    • GLOSSARY
    • CHINA PERSECUTION MAP
  • FROM THE WORLD
    • NEWS GLOBAL
    • TESTIMONIES GLOBAL
    • OP-EDS GLOBAL
    • FEATURED GLOBAL
  • INTERVIEWS
  • DOCUMENTS AND TRANSLATIONS
    • DOCUMENTS
    • THE TAI JI MEN CASE
    • TRANSLATIONS
    • EVENTS
  • ABOUT
  • EDITORIAL BOARD
  • TOPICS

Bitter Winter

A magazine on religious liberty and human rights

three friends of winter
Home / From the World / Testimonies Global

MP Räsänen and Bishop Pohjola: What Their Legal Victory Really Means

04/04/2022Massimo Introvigne |

A Finnish court found them not guilty of homophobic hate speech. It does not mean that religious liberty justifies everything. But it means that not every religious-based criticism of certain lifestyles is hate speech.

by Massimo Introvigne

Räsänen surrounded by reporters. Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.
Räsänen surrounded by reporters. Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.

The criminal trial against Finnish MP (and former Minister of Interior) Päivi Räsänen and Lutheran Bishop Juhana Pohjola concluded last week, perhaps unexpectedly, with a total success of the defendants. Not only were they declared not guilty of all charges, but the prosecution was also ordered to contribute more than 60,000 euros towards their legal costs.

Bitter Winter had presented the case when the trial started in January. Räsänen was accused of hate speech, a crime that may lead to a jail penalty in Finland, although prosecutors were only seeking a heavy fine in her case. According to the prosecutors, Räsänen showed intolerance of the LGBT community in three separate occasions: in a radio interview, in a booklet (published by Bishop Pohjola’s publishing house), and in a tweet. Räsänen quoted inter alia the Biblical text of Romans 1:27, where we read that “men also abandoned natural relations with women and were inflamed with lust for one another. Men committed shameful acts with other men, and received in themselves the due penalty for their error.” She also called homosexual acts “sinful” and the results of a “negative developmental disorder.”

Many in Finland and internationally saw the trial as one where secular Finnish prosecutors tried to criminalize Paul the Apostle and the Bible. I proposed in Bitter Winter a complementary view, noting that Pohjola represents the Evangelical Lutheran Mission Diocese of Finland (ELMDC), a splinter group that in 2013 left the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland (ELCF) accusing the latter of being too liberal. The ELCF is still officially recognized as the national church, together with the much smaller Orthodox Church of Finland, and is traditionally associated with Finnish national identity. I suggested that, while the position of conservatives siding with Räsänen and Pohjola was obvious, liberals that argued they should be convicted in order to protect LGBT rights might inadvertently support a defense of the monopoly of the ELCF against a splinter denominations whose bishops had been publicly defrocked and called by the majority church traitors of their ordination vows.

The Finnish judges concluded that “it is not for the district court to interpret biblical concepts.” They noted that not everything is permitted in the name of free speech and freedom of religion. However, “there must be an overriding social reason for interfering with and restricting freedom of expression.” If there was such a social reason in the Räsänen case, the Finnish court found that it was not “overriding.”

Räsänen and Pohjola had massive international support among conservative Christians and a larger constituency of advocates of religious liberty. The U.S.-based Alliance Defending Freedom International played a leading role in their defense in the Finnish case.

Räsänen with Alliance Defending Freedom’s Paul Coleman. Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.
Räsänen with Alliance Defending Freedom’s Paul Coleman. Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.

In 2011, I served as the Representative of the OSCE for combating racism, xenophobia, and intolerance and discrimination against Christians and members of other religions. Part of my portfolio was combating hate speech. Another part was protecting religious liberty of Christians. I had to deal with several thorny cases where Christians were accused of hate speech targeting the LGBT community. In some of these incidents, they had simply quoted the Bible or statements of faith such as the official “Catechism of the Catholic Church,” which (the openings of Pope Francis notwithstanding) still states that “the homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.” In other cases, more frequent in Eastern Europe, Christian ministers had advocated for “action,” and even instigated what became violent riots against LGBT gatherings and Gay Pride parades.

The two kinds of incidents are obviously different. As the Finnish judges said, not everything is protected by freedom of expression and religious liberty. However, freedom of religion is so important that the notion of “religion-based hate speech” should be interpreted cautiously and restrictively. Inciting a mob to assault a Gay Pride parade, justifying the actions of such a mob with theological arguments (which is not unheard of, including among high leaders: Patriarch Kirill used opposition to Gay Pride to justify even the aggression against Ukraine), or telling secular employers that they should discriminate against their LGBT employees, are forms of hate speech that cannot be justified in the name of religious freedom. Quoting the Bible or Christian tradition to argue that homosexual acts are “disordered” or sinful is something that social majorities may find objectionable in many Western countries, but is within the rights of religionists to proclaim their own doctrines, as unpopular as they may be.

Pohjola (left) and Räsänen (right). Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.
Pohjola (left) and Räsänen (right). Source: Alliance Defending Freedom International.

The red line that should not be crossed is the direct justification of violence and discrimination in secular activities—while, as courts in several countries have repeatedly stated, religions have a certain latitude to discriminate in their specifically religious sphere, for example by stating that homosexuals cannot marry each other in church or become priests, nuns, or bishops. Courts have observed that in these cases the homosexuals’ own religious liberty is not violated. They can always leave the Catholic Church or other churches with similar rules and join more liberal denominations, or even found new churches and religions.

The Finnish judges concluded that Räsänen and Pohjola had not crossed the red line. This is a factual issue, but when they affirmed that, as long as the red line is not crossed, criticism of lifestyles certain believers for religious reasons do not approve of is protected as free speech and a legitimate manifestation of religious liberty the Finnish judges were consistent with mainline international case law, and affirmed general principles about freedom of religion or belief.

Tagged With: Christian Churches, Finland, Religious Liberty

Massimo Introvigne
Massimo Introvigne

Massimo Introvigne (born June 14, 1955 in Rome) is an Italian sociologist of religions. He is the founder and managing director of the Center for Studies on New Religions (CESNUR), an international network of scholars who study new religious movements. Introvigne is the author of some 70 books and more than 100 articles in the field of sociology of religion. He was the main author of the Enciclopedia delle religioni in Italia (Encyclopedia of Religions in Italy). He is a member of the editorial board for the Interdisciplinary Journal of Research on Religion and of the executive board of University of California Press’ Nova Religio.  From January 5 to December 31, 2011, he has served as the “Representative on combating racism, xenophobia and discrimination, with a special focus on discrimination against Christians and members of other religions” of the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). From 2012 to 2015 he served as chairperson of the Observatory of Religious Liberty, instituted by the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in order to monitor problems of religious liberty on a worldwide scale.

www.cesnur.org/

Related articles

  • Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army

    Russia: Two Evangelical Pastors Prosecuted, Falsely Accused of Raising Money for the Ukrainian Army

  • The U.S. Department of State 2023 Religious Freedom Report: Excellent on Enemies, Soft on Allies

    The U.S. Department of State 2023 Religious Freedom Report: Excellent on Enemies, Soft on Allies

  • Sinicization of Christianity Comes to Hong Kong

    Sinicization of Christianity Comes to Hong Kong

  • Russia: Anapa Pastor Sent to Labor Colony for Contacts with “Undesirable” Foreign Churches

    Russia: Anapa Pastor Sent to Labor Colony for Contacts with “Undesirable” Foreign Churches

Keep Reading

  • Por qué las “sectas” (y el “lavado de cerebro”) no existen
    Por qué las “sectas” (y el “lavado de cerebro”) no existen

    Massimo Introvigne hablando en el Foro de Buenos Aires.

  • Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia
    Liquidating the SOVA Center: The Official End of Religious Freedom in Russia

    By destroying the leading organization monitoring religious liberty violations, the Putin regime can no longer pretend that relics of freedom of religion remain in Russia. 

  • Georgia Becomes First U.S. State to Pass an Anti-Hinduphobia Resolution
    Georgia Becomes First U.S. State to Pass an Anti-Hinduphobia Resolution

    Some media have criticized the text as an “answer” to the so-called “Seattle Caste Law.” But the campaign for the Resolution had started before the Seattle controversies.  

  • “Deadly Fasting” in Kenya: What We Know So Far
    “Deadly Fasting” in Kenya: What We Know So Far

    Pastor Paul Makenzie Nthenge of Good News International Church is accused of having persuaded several dozen members to fast until death. 

Primary Sidebar

Support Bitter Winter

Learn More

Follow us

Newsletter

Most Read

  • There Are Christian Uyghurs, Too: New Organization Launched in London by Ruth Ingram
  • Hui Muslims Clash with Police Over Mosque’s “Sinicization” by Ma Guangyao
  • Russia: Lunatic Theory that Yellowstone Volcano Caused the War in Ukraine Gains Momentum by Massimo Introvigne
  • Xi Jinping: Beijing’ National Art Museum Is Not Socialist Enough by Hu Zimo
  • Hong-Kong-Style National Security Law Comes to Macau by Gladys Kwok
  • Vandalism Against Catholic Churches on the Rise in Bavaria by PierLuigi Zoccatelli
  • Pakistan: Bishops’ Patience Exhausted After Killings at Catholic School by Daniela Bovolenta

CHINA PERSECUTION MAP -SEARCH NEWS BY REGION

clickable geographical map of china, with regions

Footer

EDITORIAL BOARD

Editor-in-Chief

MASSIMO INTROVIGNE

Director-in-Charge

MARCO RESPINTI

ADDRESS

CESNUR

Via Confienza 19,

10121 Turin, Italy,

Phone: 39-011-541950

E-MAIL

We welcome submission of unpublished contributions, news, and photographs. Each submission implies the authorization for us to edit and publish texts and photographs. We reserve the right to decide which submissions are suitable for publication. Please, write to INFO@BITTERWINTER.ORG Thank you.

Newsletter

LINKS

orlir-logo hrwf-logo cesnur-logo

Copyright © 2023 · Bitter Winter · PRIVACY POLICY· COOKIE POLICY