Tai Ji Men

That courts can accept the obviously false argument that Tai Ji Men is a cram school was explained in the program of which we publish a transcript with the systemic pro-government bias of Taiwan’s administrative courts.

In the second part of the transcript of a Taiwanese program, a lawyer explains the mistakes made by the Taichung judges in their controversial decision.

The first part of the transcript of a successful Taiwanese program, where the Tai Ji Men case and the recent unjust Taichung High Administrative Court decision were discussed in depth.

International law, at whose origin is the “Roerich Pact” promoted in the 1930s by Russian painter Nicholas Roerich, protects the inviolability of religious buildings and lands.

Tai Ji Men offers a praiseworthy example of global advocacy for peace and justice. The injustice it suffers in Taiwan should be rectified.

Denying justice to Tai Ji Men, as the Taichung High Administrative Court did on August 2, means that transitional justice problems have not been solved in Taiwan.

An international webinar on the eve of UN International Day of Peace discussed the necessary connection between peace and justice, and the Tai Ji Men case.

In theory, everybody is in favor of peace. However, peace is impossible if injustices such as the one vested on Tai Ji Men in Taiwan are not rectified.

Peace through justice is the first goal for a sustainable world. The U.N. and democratic states themselves are often weak in pursuing it, as the Tai Ji Men case demonstrates.

For the tenth time, the United Nations’s highest human rights body hears about the Tai Ji Men case.